KyeU
join:2003-12-31
Canada | reply to gate1975mlm
Re: Ad-aware SE Personal Edition 1.05????? Dadkins, that's hilarious.
The remover is defective. The definitions lists are also defective. 
Christos, I don't blame the administrators of the forums. It's the technical department and the CEO(s) who should be blamed.
Why they didn't include WhenU in their newest definition list, I don't know. But it will make a lot of people even more mad. |
|
 dadkinsCan you do Blu?Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA
kudos:18
2 edits | Hilarious, well... sort of. Kind of sad too. 
Some people are still defending Lavasoft's decisions and Ad-Aware's viability/TAC System. I see this as another strike against them.
No problem, for me at least. I have MANY other ways to clean ALL forms of crap off of a computer.
EDIT: This little experiment I did, also doesn't look too good for WhenU's hint of a turn-around. Leaving that much crud in the registry cannot be considered User Friendly. Not being listed in Add/Remove Programs is not good as well.
Take care people!
David |
|
| I was wondering about useing an older version of ad-aware instead. Because, I think if they could remove When-u from there files why not when they release an update, instead of adding more things to scan for that they remove some things instead. |
|
|
|
