<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>I&#x27;m don&#x27;t need any 3.5 g  I need 800-999 Mhz in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r12886078</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:05:58 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:05:58 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: I&#x27;m don&#x27;t need any 3.5 g  I need 800-999 Mhz</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12898421</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/908026"><b>PDXPLT</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  flushls <A HREF="/useremail/u/1102813"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR>Really this does not help me one bit all my customers are NLOS and 3.5 does not work well in those kinds of conditions. So how about a 100+ mhz of sub 999. for us rural WISP's </DIV>Just wait... there's another Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to let WISP's operate in TV Channels 5 to 51, if there's no TV station in the area using it.<br><br>At 6 MHz per TV channel, that's LOTS of spectrum below 700 MHz for use by rural WISP's, where typically there are few TV stations in operation.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12898421</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2005 02:30:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I&#x27;m don&#x27;t need any 3.5 g  I need 800-999 Mhz</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12888691</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/348012"><b>cmaenginsb</b></A> : I hear a lot of people talking about the "increased power", however without clarification as to whether this is TX power or EIRP there's little to say about this. <br><br>If it's only EIRP then the power limits are little better than what is in place now with PTmP rules and are close to PTmP rules.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12888691</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:41:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I&#x27;m don&#x27;t need any 3.5 g  I need 800-999 Mhz</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12886357</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/123385"><b>korym</b></A> : Actually, this might be helpful to you because of the increased power range.  Just a thought. :)<br><br>Regards,<br>Kory]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12886357</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:02:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>I&#x27;m don&#x27;t need any 3.5 g  I need 800-999 Mhz</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12886078</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1102813"><b>flushls</b></A> : Really this does not help me one bit all my customers are NLOS and 3.5 does not work well in those kinds of conditions. So how about a 100+ mhz of sub 999. for us rural WISP's<br><br>Flushls]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12886078</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:15:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
