republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
283
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Tsume
Premium
join:2004-02-23
Johnson City, TN
Reviews:
·Comcast

I believe this is justified

It isn't nearly as bad as most unwanted-wares to date, and it really doesn't steal very private information.

However, I do not believe that this should be removed from adware/spyware scanners. It should still be enabled for deletion by default, and be optional to disable scanning for it [I know you can do this in Spybot S&D].

They actually sent a nice letter, one that doesn't accuse or point fingers. If that is truely representing of the company, then I do believe this falls under Adware and not Spyware. To me, it's the same when it comes to scanning and deletion. It just isn't a big privacy risk.


entropy1
Premium
join:2002-09-25

"They actually sent a nice letter, one that doesn't accuse or point fingers. If that is truely representing of the company, then I do believe this falls under Adware and not Spyware."
------------------------------------------------------------
Uh...being nice changes what Cydoor is? No. Junk is junk is crap no matter what sort of "nice" marketing talk is spread on it. Adware...spyware...all junk/crap. Whether it's a privacy risk or not matters very little to me. It's the fact that it's obtrusive, unwanted and a pain in the ass to get out that makes this CRAP. Ok? Take a hike, Cydoor.


Sunday, 27-May 17:55:41 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics