<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: On Par for the Telcos in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r12941146</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:37:10 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:37:10 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: On Par for the Telcos</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12941146</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/202891"><b>shashinka</b></A> : It is REALLY stupid that most of the Telco VOIP plans are almost the same as their POTs plans.  Get a CLUE!  <br><br>Cable/Vonage, Dry DSL/Vonage.<br><br>Speaking of Dry DSL, check out speakeasy's new QOS Dry DSL/VOIP offering.  That is a great package if you're worried about QOS from your provider.  For me I don't really care because I have my cell as a backup.  If charter is having a problem on their network I'll just use my cell, worth only having to pay Vonage $15 a month to keep my home phone (for kids and security system).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12941146</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:24:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>On Par for the Telcos</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12940393</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : This is on-par for all telco initiated voice over IP.  They seem to think that telephone service should be $40 per month, and if you look at the offerings from SBC and Verizon, VoIP is about that.  AT&T was pricey enough, and like the incumbents, they totally miss the point of VoIP; that people are tired of paying outrageous amounts of money for what should be declining prices for old technology.<br><br> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12940393</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2005 09:31:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
