site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
78
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

Tubisten

join:2005-01-31
Farmersville, TX

Do it like the power lines?

Why are they not splitting up the lines from the service, the same way they did with the power companies (at least here in Texas and in Sweden). IOW let one company keep the lines in order and let another company do the service providing part. The lines were and will always be unfair to keep in one company since they were subsidized by the government. This way it would be less likely for them to use it unfairly like this.


Danger Will Robinson

@gambrl01.md.comcast.

Although this seems like a good idea, having worked for a while in the power industry, I can tell you that there are some definite down sides. The biggest is that the utilities no longer subsidized the lines, and the company that operated the lines now had to make a separate profit just to service them.

End result - line charges are now a separate line item, as the utility now has to pass on the costs directly, and to yet another outside for-profit company. It also takes longer to service lines, as now you have to go through two layers of management to get anything done.

That wasn't the only "bad thing"(TM) to happen with deregulation, but it certainly didn't help. Ironically, the power grid didn't become more reliable as a result. It was already fairly reliable, and for the most part, the same sorts of things that happened before deregulation (traffic accidents, ice storms, squirrels, etc) still happened afterwards.

So, having the lines owned by a separate entity may or may not be a bad idea, but keep in mind that it isn't a perfect panacea.


Sunday, 27-May 17:19:26 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics