site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
108
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


AmeritecTech
Change we can believe in, 1922
Premium
join:2002-09-06
Houston, TX
kudos:6

Don't think they should be forced

I don't think companies should be forced to provide naked DSL....

That said, this move by the FCC is a clear violation of the tenth amendment. If I were a state, I would continue enforcing my laws and make the FCC take it to court.
--
"Either I will destroy this totalitarian police state or it will destroy me."
-Michael Badnarik

Link

bfranks

join:2002-06-22
Arlington, VA

Tenth Amendment:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Well, its not really a clear violation. If tenth amendment theory holds water, then the FCC wouldn't exist. This would be very bad in terms of spectrum allocation, etc.

I try to think of the telco as any other business. Say for example an airline didn't fly to a specific destination, yet were required by some regulatory board to sell tickets to competitors at less than the cost of what it actually costs them to fly there. Shouldn't happen.

Capitalism is a good thing, and with the large fiber build up thats about to occur, the telcos are going to need as much money as then can get. Further, the landscape in terms of competitiveness has changed since the law that Powell struck down came into existence. With Cable companies providing phone (VoIP), video, and internet, coupled with the fact that Wireless exists, the law should have been changed.


PDXPLT

join:2003-12-04
Banks, OR

I think telecommunications, and radio communications certainly, is considered interstate commerce. That gives Congress the right to pass the Communcations Act of 1934, which created the FCC.


DSL Oberst

join:2001-11-29

reply to AmeritecTech
Since the telecommunication companies are coducting business interstate rather than purely intrastate, the FCC regulations [being the regulations of the federal government] would automatically take precedence.



AmeritecTech
Change we can believe in, 1922
Premium
join:2002-09-06
Houston, TX
kudos:6

said by DSL Oberst:

Since the telecommunication companies are coducting business interstate rather than purely intrastate, the FCC regulations [being the regulations of the federal government] would automatically take precedence.
All fine and well, but even small providers that operate in only one state are subject to FCC regulations. The same is true of small radio stations who have a signal that is not strong enough to reach the state border.
--
"Either I will destroy this totalitarian police state or it will destroy me."
-Michael Badnarik

Link

Sunday, 27-May 17:19:35 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics