 | reply to TheMadSwede
Re: Over and underestimating... said by TheMadSwede:All sides, save those who do not care, are unwilling to compromise or recognize faults in their arguments. Thus we're left with a useless, unwinnable debate that's been had for too long on BBR. I've grown tired of the debates here as well, although you'll find most of the pro-BPL banter is "give me fast cheap broadband in the country now" types of arguments. Ham radio certainly isn't the end-all-be-all of communications but it has its place, but BPL is far from what its proponents claim it to be.
Only time will tell who wins this, but with the BPL hype-athon in its third year, it's not much beyond several test beds and a couple commercial sites. DSL and cable grew much, much faster than this and that was arguably before broadband had widespread acceptance. |
 | Well said. I personally don't know enough about either technology to make technical arguments for or against, but when I see some people so unwilling to even discuss a matter and other so willing to dive into something with no thought whatsoever, both sides end up reeking of cognitive dissonance and/or groupthink. -- home |