Re: unlimited bandwidth but.... in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r13234968 en Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:33:50 EDT Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:33:50 EDT Re: unlimited bandwidth but.... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13237824 pcscdma : I'm not sure what you mean. Please explain.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13237824 Fri, 22 Apr 2005 21:55:03 EDT Re: unlimited bandwidth but.... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13237743 inteller : good lord, in that case, move the FOCK away from there! I am not aware of many places these days that can offer DSL but not cable]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13237743 Fri, 22 Apr 2005 21:43:33 EDT Re: unlimited bandwidth but.... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13234968 pcscdma :
said by inteller See Profile:

Why dont these companies go under?
Because in most places it is either Internet service with this company or you're stuck on dial-up.
The Bells and CableCos try to kill off municipalities because there is "competition" and say stuff like "private companies can do things better" and whatever capitalist rhetoric they can think of at the time. The 'free-market' theories that are thrown up by the Heartland Institute and the like stipulate that these kind of companies will go under. Competition is usually defined by the Bells and CableCos as two different selections in the same market. There's definitely a higher chance of collusion when there are less players on the field. The anti-muni stuff is an example of collusion.
The Bells don't really like VoIP. Unless, of course, they are providing it. The CableCos are hyping triple-quad-whatever play so they are doing their own little thing. It really is a nice way to kill off Vonage.
--
"The bad news is that we are told that Michael Powell, one of Washington's better bureaucrats, is calling it quits today after four years at the helm of the Federal Communications Commission." - WSJ 2005/01/21]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13234968 Fri, 22 Apr 2005 15:19:04 EDT Re: unlimited bandwidth but.... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13234875 anon : Why dont these companies go under?
MONOPOLY]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13234875 Fri, 22 Apr 2005 15:06:17 EDT unlimited bandwidth but.... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13234725 inteller : ....if you actually want to use it you can't.

It's like saying you can have all the gold in Fort Knox.

Why dont these companies go under?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13234725 Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:42:04 EDT