Re: Wording in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r13236095 en Sun, 06 Dec 2009 09:36:15 EDT Sun, 06 Dec 2009 09:36:15 EDT Re: Wording http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13236095 Matt :
said by Pz_ See Profile:

I was leaning more towards absurd.
As was I.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13236095 Fri, 22 Apr 2005 17:53:13 EDT Re: Wording http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13235018 Pz_ : I was leaning more towards absurd.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13235018 Fri, 22 Apr 2005 15:27:11 EDT Re: Wording http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13234964 ropeguru :
said by Matt See Profile:

"Don't handle traffic greater than 64kbps"
So does that mean any of their customers that surf web sites cab ONLY get 64kbps speeds?? If so, why would I want their service at all. Would rather have dialup..
--
FWD#: 223611]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13234964 Fri, 22 Apr 2005 15:18:37 EDT Wording http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13234574 Matt : "Don't handle traffic greater than 64kbps" = "We don't want applications that use that much bandwidth on our network."

That is very underhanded.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13234574 Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:19:56 EDT