 AD7BKPremium
join:2000-03-23
Havre, MT
 ·3Rivers Communic..
| reply to SpitefulCrow
Re: UPLOAD speed sucks really bad... Booyah Good schooling
Be aware that BPL can be taken down by a legal cb radio operator BPL is not the way to go.
FTTH is
And no I am not totally against BPL just need to use a diffrent frequency set.
like 2-400 or even higher up. Sure costs more but less chance of interference.
--
The following statement is true...
The preceding statement was false!!--George Carlin |
|
 SpitefulCrowInsert Witty Tag HerePremium
join:2003-06-04
Berkeley, CA | Nearly every frequency band has been licensed by the FCC and has communications on it at this point. The exceptions are the amateur bands, but you can't very well go stomping all over someone's 2.4GHz Wi-Fi setup or the other amateur equipment at 160-210MHz and ~600MHz. |
|
1 edit | I am a BPL hardware vendor who thinks he can spam BBR forums. |
|
| reply to SpitefulCrow
BPL *could* work fine on UHF and above frequencies, as those signals do not propagate around the world like HF and sometimes low band VHF. Even very low power signals in the HF portion of the spectrum will propagate easily, and can travel around the world. This will cause a problem when those signals are interference, and are traveling on wires that happen to be excellent radiators (antennas) for the frequencies in operation. If the frequency was increased, the power lines would be less efficient radiators, and will inherently cause less interference. Secondly, because of the nature of UHF/SHF/Microwave propagation, what interference that did escape would not travel nearly as far as it would if it were @ HF.
This technology isn't purely evil, but it in it's current state it is far from being ready for deployment. Experiments with BPL in the upper frequency bands have proven viable.
Just my .02
~ |
|
