site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1
Reviews:
·T-Mobile US

reply to ke4pym

Re: LOL

LOL that's not preferential treatment. Preferential treatment does not follow any kind of logic - it's purely subjective. The reasoning behind the equal pricing isn't subjective, it's based on distance. How come you're only looking at it like the 3mbits are paying for 7mbit service, and not that the 7mbits are paying for 3mbit service? Glass half-empty, i guess.
--
»quackleducks.blogspot.com/


Fatal Vector

@aol.com


Besides, if it's a "best effort"-seemingly meaning without speed caps-it stands to reason that speeds will slowly decline the further out you are from the CO. Maybe if you're an "inch too far" instead of getting 7 Mb, you get 6 3/4...I could live with that. And, if they make it clear that the offer is "the fastest we can provide to you at a set price" People who sign up knowing this have no complaint, allthough it would make sense to lower the price for those who are too far away and can only get 1.5Mb.

This is just another gimmick to hide a price increase and try to polish their image with the clueless, since, I'm sure, most customers will fall into the 1-5 Mb range.


dynodb
Premium,VIP
join:2004-04-21
Minneapolis, MN

said by Fatal Vector:


This is just another gimmick to hide a price increase and try to polish their image with the clueless, since, I'm sure, most customers will fall into the 1-5 Mb range.
The price for 1.5M is unchanged; you have to sign up for the higher speed at $10 more a month. How are they hiding a price increase?

Sunday, 27-May 13:18:04 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics