 W8ASATieng gi vay?
join:2000-07-31
Dayton, OH
 ·AT&T Midwest
| $5 per month PLUS.... additional $.79 for each song if you want the "permanent" download so you can burn a CD, etc. Not a great deal. I can pay $5 per month and have streaming music on my computer here at work, or turn on the radio and have it free. Hmm.... how to choose?
--
Microwave and RF Components at www.ohiomicrowave.com |
|
|
|
| said by W8ASA:. I can pay $5 per month and have streaming music on my computer here at work, or turn on the radio and have it free. Hmm.... how to choose? It's all about fidelity there. While FM and AM radio are free the frequency response and signal to noise ratio is nowhere near that of a decent streaming audio service. Radio music is compressed and limited much more compared to the actual CD (or vinyl record even). A decent ear for music can tell the different right away. If Yahoo is streaming at 192k it sounds to be the audio quality will definitely be better.
$5 a month for a better listening experience or practically non-dynamic compressed music for free? That's where the real decision will be.
As for $.79 downloads at 192k that's getting closer to what I feel would be a fair trade off. $.75 is what I would consider a fair "list" price and $.50 would be the good deal. |
|
 sporkmedrop the crantini and move it, sisterPremium,MVM
join:2000-07-01
Morristown, NJ
 ·Optimum Online
| said by SRFireside:It's all about fidelity there. While FM and AM radio are free the frequency response and signal to noise ratio is nowhere near that of a decent streaming audio service. Radio music is compressed and limited much more compared to the actual CD (or vinyl record even). A decent ear for music can tell the different right away. Depends on the station... I listen to a ton off over-the-air broadcasts, just not the commercial junk. The college stations, indy stations, NPR don't lay the compression on anywhere as much as the average rock station ("Listen to us!! We're louder!!"). We have three stations here that just sound much better over the air than streamed (WBGO, WFMU, WNYC), mainly because they don't compress the hell out of the audio. Just to clarify, you and I are not talking about compression as far as "data compression", but audio compression/limiting where the audio gain is automatically "adjusted" to make everything sound bigger and louder - low levels are boosted, peaks are squashed, resulting in a very flat sound with little dynamic range. I believe this practice started as stations competed to be the "loudest" so they'd stand out as you scanned the dial for music.
A good FM tuner and antenna still goes a long way. Unless you are in ClearChannel Hell and there's nothing you want to listen to on the radio. 
--
Bush/Cheney '04! - Scared Straight
"Patriotism is supporting your country all the time and your government when it deserves it." |
|
