Your point is correct, but you're really asking for honest discourse between the parties involved when one of them hide behind anonynimity and are only available for communication via one-way newsgroup postings?
Um, what discourse is needed exactly? The terms of these services are clearly listed on their website (what causes listings, what it akes to make them go away, etc)
Error accountability. But I've had that debate, and it bores the shit out of me.
My point was that demanding honest representation of SPEWS strikes me as disingenuous. I think you've got to expect some misrepresentation when you hide anonymously in digital caves and only speak via proxy servants....
