 ctceoPremium
join:2001-04-26
South Bend, IN
 ·magicjack.com
 ·AT&T U-Verse
 ·AT&T Midwest
| reply to ctceo
Re: Mentioned this before Theres plenty of headroom, They just don't want to part with it unless they can make more money. We all know they could give every DSL subscriber max sync with little extra cost to them, and not stress the network because it's built on a much larger backbone. The picture above is not a fake one, It is from a client of mine, therefore at least 2 pairs in not theoretical, but actually happening. I've yet to install more than that myself, but have had some interested companies. Also if you were to use my homes max sync of 8128Down/1088up, you would have even more bandwidth. and I'm sure that if they charged $35-$45 for basic services:
People want News, Weather, Sports, Movies & Music. The basic 5, and I can think of about 20 channels that would fit that role quite well without all the junk channels like Home shopping ripoff channel (this $10 toaster can be yours for only 20 easy payments of $9.99) junk.
--
ASUS SK8N nForce3 - 8GB PC2700 - AXP 64 3400+ - nVidia 6800 Ultra w/512mb - CL Audigy 2 PP - WD SATA150 36GB + Hitachi GST 250GB - Plextor PX708A + Sony CRX300A - Dual 600 Watt PSU's. |
