site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

bogey780

join:2004-03-19
Here
kudos:1

reply to calvoiper

Re: Good for the phone company

Those are all things they're continuing to have to pay on. A good many people alive today never had phone service under Ma Bell when they bought their home.

So why put the emphasis on the ROW when talking about developing a better infrastructure? Is it a better infrastructure you want or just to see any company that spawned from Ma Bell to go out of business?


calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

I want to see fair competition without undue advantage to the companies that had a century long headstart under a government sanctioned monopoly.

Now if they can't compete in a competitive environment, whose fault is that?

(BTW, many of the things I mentioned are not things the BOCs pay for today--they were given them in the past, for free, or they have been fully paid off by monopoly revenues.)

Calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!


Sunday, 27-May 17:48:13 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics