 Sean
join:2004-01-23
Toronto | Personally. I don't personally agree with downloading movies that are still in theatres. DVDs are fine... but not movies still in theatres. But whatever.
The more we let the MPAA fight their battle, the better off we are. They don't see that yet. We need to stop telling them their wrong. Let them fight, let them lose. |
|
 TransmasterDon't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus
join:2001-06-20
Cheyenne, WY | said by Sean:I don't personally agree with downloading movies that are still in theatres. DVDs are fine... but not movies still in theatres. But whatever. The more we let the MPAA fight their battle, the better off we are. They don't see that yet. We need to stop telling them their wrong. Let them fight, let them lose. I agree, I feel I am getting my moneys worth on DVD's if I have to wait for the release that is fine. It is a waste to download these crappy copies. I downloaded a bootleg copy of Chamber of Secrets just out of curiosity it took hours and it was so bad I deleted it after a few minutes of viewing. I simply will not waste my time.
--
Low voltage Tech's are wimps, Real tech's use 45 pound filament transformers, plate voltages no less then 2400 volts with at least 10 amp's lighting 8877 triodes...BPL I'm coming to get you. |
|
| reply to Sean
said by Sean:I don't personally agree with downloading movies that are still in theatres. DVDs are fine... but not movies still in theatres. But whatever. I actually do the opposite. If I liked a movie in theater, I would download a screener so that I can watch it at home instead of visiting the theater multiple times until it is officially released on DVD. Once the DVD comes out, I buy it and trash the screener.
--
Ask me no questions, and I'll tell you no lies...
A MESSAGE to the RIAA and the MPAA: You shouldn't wound what you can't kill... |
|
 djrobx
join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
kudos:1
 ·Verizon Wireless..
 ·RoadRunner Cable
 ·AT&T U-Verse
 ·VOIPo
·PHONE POWER
| quote:
If I liked a movie in theater, I would download a screener so that I can watch it at home instead of visiting the theater multiple times
I might utilize your philosophy if I actually liked anything Hollywood was putting out. I'll be going to see Star Wars next weekend (first time back in a theater in over two years), but that's based more on fondness for the original trilogy than anything else.
--
\\ROB - a part of the SCB local network |
|
Sean
join:2004-01-23
Toronto
1 edit | reply to Pirate515
That's fine as well. What I meant though, was that I don't agree with downloading a movie without watching it in theatres first.
Though, I don't buy DVDs, simply because I refuse to pay $24 for a movie + 234820482 hours of footage I'll never watch. I want the movie, and maybe an hour or two of behind the scenes stuff. Not 92357 hours. I'm confident the price would go down to $15 if they just put the movie on there. |
|
| reply to djrobx
said by djrobx:I might utilize your philosophy if I actually liked anything Hollywood was putting out. Well that's another reason why people out there are downloading. They see a screener, realize that the movie sucks, and never see it on a big screen. By taking downloading out of the equation, MPAA hopes to bring the curious ones to the theaters. Think about it, they go to see some unknown movie, find out that it sucks, but by then it is too late, they've already spent the money on tickets.
--
Ask me no questions, and I'll tell you no lies...
A MESSAGE to the RIAA and the MPAA: You shouldn't wound what you can't kill... |
|
 ArchAngel21xWaiting For iPhone 5Premium
join:2001-10-28
Lincoln, NE
 ·Internet Nebraska
| reply to Sean
$24? You must be shopping at the wrong places. There are plenty of stores that sell DVDs for less than that. Also, waiting a while for the price to drop helps. I wish the same could be said for CDs.
--
For web hosting, I choose Powweb. |
|
|
|
TransmasterDon't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus
join:2001-06-20
Cheyenne, WY | said by ArchAngel21x:$24? You must be shopping at the wrong places. There are plenty of stores that sell DVDs for less than that. Also, waiting a while for the price to drop helps. I wish the same could be said for CDs. This is the same though I had. As for the extra stuff to me this is what gives such DVD's the value. The movies are interesting for sure but the extras make for a complete document. An example is The Attack of the Clones. One of the playback options includes the director, editor, and Geo' Lucas in a voice track where they discuss each of the scenes, how they where made, when they where made etc.
This is fascinating to me while the Movie is great entertainment I also enjoy learning how these movies are fashioned.
--
Low voltage Tech's are wimps, Real tech's use 45 pound filament transformers, plate voltages no less then 2400 volts with at least 10 amp's lighting 8877 triodes...BPL I'm coming to get you. |
|
 BIGMIKEPremium
join:2002-06-07
Westminster, CA | reply to Pirate515
The Star Wars III screener sucks there not going to get my money on that peace of junk. |
|
 DaMaGeINCThe Lan ManPremium
join:2002-06-08
Greenville, SC
kudos:2 | reply to Transmaster
said by Transmaster:said by Sean:I don't personally agree with downloading movies that are still in theatres. DVDs are fine... but not movies still in theatres. But whatever. The more we let the MPAA fight their battle, the better off we are. They don't see that yet. We need to stop telling them their wrong. Let them fight, let them lose. I agree, I feel I am getting my moneys worth on DVD's if I have to wait for the release that is fine. It is a waste to download these crappy copies. I downloaded a bootleg copy of Chamber of Secrets just out of curiosity it took hours and it was so bad I deleted it after a few minutes of viewing. I simply will not waste my time. Well, thats why you have to look for the good copies to come out. When new movies come out, usally for the first week or so, its all Screeners.(someone in the movie with a cam corder) Wait a few weeks till they get ahold of the DVD's then rip them to SVCD's then download those. They are usally over 2Gigs. Anything below 1.7Gig, dont waste your time.
--
inc.ath.cx
Have a Networking problem or question? Stop by the Networking Forum and let us help you. |
|
 r81984Fair and BalancedPremium
join:2001-11-14
Katy, TX
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T DSL Service
·row44
2 edits | reply to Transmaster
I am sorry you do not know how to find good copies of movies. There are screeners that look great and some that are awful.
But anyways I would never pay to go to the theater in my town (Schererville,IN). It is the worst place to go. All they want is your money. It is too packed, and ghetto people always have to talk during it. You cant even use cash at the consession stand anymore. You have to buy movie bucks from the ticket counter, then wait in line, and pay for food with those movie bucks. It makes no sense because you have no idea how much movie bucks you will need. Also think about the gas you have to waste to get there and all the time wasted in lines.
As long as theaters are not an enjoyable experience I will keep downloading movies for free. |
|
| reply to ArchAngel21x
said by ArchAngel21x:$24? You must be shopping at the wrong places. There are plenty of stores that sell DVDs for less than that. Also, waiting a while for the price to drop helps. I agree. $24 for a DVD is way too much. Actually, my local Blockbuster tries to charge that much for new releases, but this is one of the reasons why I don't do business with Blockbuster any more. Thanks to »www.dvdpricesearch.com, I buy most of my DVDs for half of that if not less.
Yes, sometimes they release special edition DVDs of some big hit movies that have tons of extras, special packaging, collectible items, etc. included in the package, and these sets usually cost more than ordinary plain versions of the same movie. But if you are looking at a regular edition of the movie with extras cut down to bare minimum, you shouldn't be spending more than $15 on it.
I believe that a while ago someone made a post on this site saying that they literally saw a Harry Potter DVD with a price tag of $15, and right next to it in the same store a CD with soundtrack from the same Harry Potter movie for $20.
--
Ask me no questions, and I'll tell you no lies...
A MESSAGE to the RIAA and the MPAA: You shouldn't wound what you can't kill... |
|
| reply to r81984
said by r81984:I am sorry you do not know how to find good copies of movies. There are screeners that look great and some that are awful. But anyways I would never pay to go to the theater in my town (Schererville,IN). It is the worst place to go. All they want is your money. It is too packed, and ghetto people always have to talk during it. You cant even use cash at the consession stand anymore. You have to buy movie bucks from the ticket counter, then wait in line, and pay for food with those movie bucks. It makes no sense because you have no idea how much movie bucks you will need. Also think about the gas you have to waste to get there and all the time wasted in lines. As long as theaters are not an enjoyable experience I will keep downloading movies for free. I couldn't agree more.
Actually GOING to the movies these days has become more of a hassle than its worth.
I might go to see some BIG release, but not normally.
This is due to:
1) High ticket priced
2) Concession prices
3) I find that there is always some low-life sitting near me that decides he must have a running commentary through the whole movie, or talk to his friends about something completely unrelated.
4) Some MORON decides to bring their kid to the theater. This kid proceeds to cry/kick/make noise, and it is a RARE occasion that the parent actually takes the child out of the the theater when they will not stop.
I have nothing against kids. I have a problem with parents not being responsbile for them.
Also, I can't BELIEVE how young some kids are that are being brought into the theaters. Their ears should not be exposed to this type of noise.
My 2 cents..
- ForeverZero - |
|
TheGhostPremium
join:2003-01-03
Lake Forest, IL | reply to Pirate515
said by Pirate515:I believe that a while ago someone made a post on this site saying that they literally saw a Harry Potter DVD with a price tag of $15, and right next to it in the same store a CD with soundtrack from the same Harry Potter movie for $20. That is another reason for falling CD sales that the RIAA doesn't want to talk about. The entertainment value of a CD compared to other entertainment just isn't there anymore.
I was walking through target and they have DVDs for $7-$10 by the checkout - making them an impulse buy. You can get new release movies (ie: Harry Potter, Robots) for $16-$18 dollars from Circuit City or Best Buy the week they come out. I couple this with the lack of music that I like being produced today and for me the choice is simple - I am sure others are making the same choices.
One of the great promises for CDs when they first came out was that they were so much cheaper to produce, but where did the savings go? Straight to profits. The RIAA did what many industries have done - priced themselves out of relevance.
TheGhost |
|
ArchAngel21xWaiting For iPhone 5Premium
join:2001-10-28
Lincoln, NE Reviews:
·Internet Nebraska
| said by TheGhost:DVDs for $7-$10 by the checkout Those cheap DVDs are one reason I have over 100 DVDs. The thing I don't like about DVDs is how 6 - 12 months later a special edition will come out. Then I wish I had just waited.
--
For web hosting, I choose Powweb. |
|
| reply to DaMaGeINC
camcorder in theatre is NOT a screener... thats a cam release... then theres the telecines which are still crap.... a VHS screener is actually OK and a DVD screener is quite good |
|
