 dadkinsCan you do Blu?
MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA
kudos:18 |
to gracie7
Re: New Release: Spybot Search & Destroy v1.4said by gracie7:guys, here's the reason: if under "file sets" you have the default "spyware only" checked, you'll see 24011. if you check "all checks", you'll see a lot more (26610 in mine). simple!  That's cool then, I have my browser erase all tracks on Exit and use CrapCleaner for anything else! Thanks gracie!  |
|
 Dustyn
Premium Member
join:2003-02-26
Ontario, CAN
kudos:13 |
to TeMerc6
 :D!!!!!!YAY!!!!!!:D:o UN-installed old version... re-booted, used registry patch, installed 1.4.... works great! |
|
Dustyn
2 edits |
to dadkins
said by dadkins:I have a count of 24011 as well.  A NORMAL COUNT OF 24011 IS DISPLAYED WITH DEFAULT SETTINGS! A FINAL 26610 DISPLAYED WITH ALL SPYWARE CHECKS ENABLED! |
|
1 edit |
to TeMerc6
while installing new detections in 1.4, a Microsoft AntiSpyware Beta1 alert popped up asking if i wanted to add 139mm.com to my ie trusted site. since i had just said yes to Spybot as a BHO (another MAS alert), i said yes to 139mm.com, but it bothered me. here is the event log from MAS.... "Internet Explorer Trusted Sites alert Occured on: 6/1/2005 at 7:23:00 PM The user Administrator, has decided to allow the trusted site 139mm.com to Internet Explorer." i see that this is not a good site, and so i checked ie trusted sites and it is not there, in fact it is in the restricted sites list so i know that this is part of what Spybot 1.4 is blocking, but i wonder why MASBeta1 gave me that alert, AND, when i inadvertantly said yes, it still did not put it in the trusted site. any feedback from others welcome thanks edit in: oops!... thanks dadkins --
look out kid they keep it all hid |
|
| |
Everyone should also check for settings needing to be ticked, JeanInMontana, mod at my place reminded me of these: Cdilla.....PUPS Cdilla.....Revision New.Net.....PUPS Side Step.......PUPS Here is the thread: » temerc.com/phpBB2/viewto ··· 909#1909--
Remember............You can NEVER be OVERPROTECTED!!»temerc.com/ |
|
 MarkAWBarry White
Premium Member
join:2001-08-27
Canada
kudos:16 |
to dadkins
said by dadkins:said by gracie7:guys, here's the reason: if under "file sets" you have the default "spyware only" checked, you'll see 24011. if you check "all checks", you'll see a lot more (26610 in mine). simple! That's cool then, I have my browser erase all tracks on Exit and use CrapCleaner for anything else! Thanks gracie! Hmmmm. I have 26749 in mine. |
|
Dustyn
Premium Member
join:2003-02-26
Ontario, CAN
kudos:13  ·TekSavvy Cable
·Rogers Hi-Speed
1 edit |
to boblandy2
I have MSAS installed but never received that alert? I did receive the BHO alert...but not the 139mm.com. It is possible that the entry was previously installed into the restricted zone on my rig when I installed Spyware Blaster 3.4 a while ago before MSAS. --
"You have no idea what I am capable of. People who have tried to cross me, have lived to regret it...~Michelle Stafford (Phyllis) |
|
| |
If you are using 1.3's hostfile, would the uninstall remove it? |
|
Dustyn
Premium Member
join:2003-02-26
Ontario, CAN
kudos:13 |
Dustyn
Premium Member
2005-Jun-1 11:54 pm
Actually I 've never used Spybot's hostfile. But I'm not sure if you meant to reply to me? |
|
|
 OwlbetIgnite the Ice
Premium Member
join:2002-09-24
Palmer, AK |
to TeMerc6
Lol, everyone is getting something different. Microsoft needs to fix this in MSAS. See screenshot. This is what I got. I checked in Trusted Zone, it wasn't there. It was, however, in Restricted Zone as it should be. Just curious, how many items show up when you Immunize? Mine shows 6,547 bad products are now blocked. Is this more than version 1.3? BTW, check SpywareBlaster to make sure everything is enabled there. I've had a problem when I download IE-Spyad or upgrade to a new version of Spybot that certain things become disabled or undone in SpywareBlaster.
--
Rocky is, was, and always will be Dawg E. Dawg. Miss you, pal. |
|
| |
to Dustyn
said by Dustyn:It is possible that... between Spybot and a Microsoft program in beta i'd say anything is possible --
look out kid they keep it all hid |
|
Mele20
Premium Member
join:2001-06-05
Hilo, HI
kudos:8 |
to MarkAW
said by MarkAW:said by dadkins:said by gracie7:guys, here's the reason: if under "file sets" you have the default "spyware only" checked, you'll see 24011. if you check "all checks", you'll see a lot more (26610 in mine). simple! That's cool then, I have my browser erase all tracks on Exit and use CrapCleaner for anything else! Thanks gracie! Hmmmm. I have 26749 in mine. By "everything checked" do you mean INCLUDING usage tracking? I have everything checked except usage tracking and I have the same number definitions for 3.1Tx and 4.0 -24011. --
Around 2005 a sudden spark will catalyze a Crisis mood. The very survial of the nation will seem to be at stake.Sometime before 2025, America will pass through a great gate in history. The risk and promise will be very high. The Fourth Turning Wm. Strauss |
|
Liline
join:2005-05-04
Snellville, GA |
Liline
Member
2005-Jun-2 3:08 am
I'm also getting 24,011. |
|
 pr1mo
Premium Member
join:2003-11-12
Harwood Heights, IL
kudos:2 |
to TeMerc6
okay, got definition update to 26110 or something. Speed of scan is the same, but always nice to update |
|
 bigyeah
Premium Member
join:2004-06-25 |
to TeMerc6
My scan took 2 seconds, is that possible? |
|
 Telly Boot
Premium Member
join:2002-05-15
Vancouver, BC |
said by bigyeah:My scan took 2 seconds, is that possible? As noted elsewhere, you have to close Spybot after updating the definitions, then open it again and run it. It takes about 5 minutes to scan everything on my machine. --
Dawn,n,The time when men of reason go to bed. (Ambrose Bierce.) |
|
Mele20
Premium Member
join:2001-06-05
Hilo, HI
kudos:8 |
Mele20
Premium Member
2005-Jun-2 5:11 am
I didn't have to close Spybot, after updating the definitions, in order to conduct a proper scan. But then I didn't do a separate upgrade of the definitions. 1.4 comes with the latest definitions..the very same ones that I installed an hour before on 1.3Tx. It took 2 minutes, 40 seconds to do a scan same as it did an hour earlier with 3.1Tx.
I upgraded mostly to see if 4.0 would find Backweb like 1.3 did for the first time. 4.0 also finds Backweb. A bunch of Registry entries. I don't know why it thinks Backweb is spyware in the sense we usually think of spyware. I don't have the nasty Backweb. So I'm puzzled about this. Why would it suddenly find Backweb in Netscape 7.2, which I have had for ages, and it never found that before? I think it is a FP. I also upgraded Adaware tonight and it didn't find any Backweb.
--
Around 2005 a sudden spark will catalyze a Crisis mood. The very survial of the nation will seem to be at stake.Sometime before 2025, America will pass through a great gate in history. The risk and promise will be very high. The Fourth Turning Wm. Strauss |
|
| |
to TeMerc6
People still use S&D? I dropped it and adaware a couple months ago when MS came out with it's spy software. I had been using S&D every other day. I put MS software on and WOW! It found all kinds of junk. I left it and got rid of all the others. So, in ones non-bias'd against microsofts products, is the new version of S&D better then MS's antispyware? |
|
 BuddelIf it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Premium Member
join:2004-03-06
EU
kudos:3 |
Buddel
Premium Member
2005-Jun-2 7:01 am
said by tc1uscg:...non-bias'd against microsofts products, ... I am by no means biased against Microsoft, but this company is biased against me: I cannot use its anti-spyware tool because I'm a WinME user.:p;) |
|
Mele20
Premium Member
join:2001-06-05
Hilo, HI
kudos:8 |
to tc1uscg
I tried MS's antispyware and it did me a lovely favor. When I uninstalled it, it killed my modem. The computer is under warranty so Dell had to send a tech to replace it. They said they had a number of users with serious hardware problems after they tried to uninstall MSAS.
I didn't like MSAS. Far too aggressive. Counterspy is the same. I have a year of it for free but I don't use it. I don't like any anti-spyware application that runs in the systray. I don't need that level of protection because I am not a newbie. I use my head and practice safe hex and I never get spyware. Spybot suits me great as I can run it on demand which is what I want in an anti-spyware application.
--
Around 2005 a sudden spark will catalyze a Crisis mood. The very survial of the nation will seem to be at stake.Sometime before 2025, America will pass through a great gate in history. The risk and promise will be very high. The Fourth Turning Wm. Strauss |
|
 Khaine
join:2003-03-03
Australia |
to TeMerc6
Its good to see a new release of Spybot Thanks for the information about the release |
|
 SirSteve
Premium Member
join:2003-11-28
Woodbury, CT
2 edits |
SirSteve
Premium Member
2005-Jun-2 8:06 am
I've encountered a problem with 1.4 final on a WinMe PC. I can't fully Immunize. When I try I always get: 1992 bad products already blocked, 3 additional products possible. Please Immunize.I click Immunize and get 1995 bad products blocked with a green checkmark. After closing and re-opening the program, then clicking Immunize, the symptom repeats with: 1992 bad products already blocked, 3 additional products possible. Please Immunize.I've already posted over at Net-Integration. » forums.net-integration.n ··· ic=31119 |
|
BuddelIf it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Premium Member
join:2004-03-06
EU
kudos:3 |
to TeMerc6
Hi SirSteve , I have exactly the same problem (also WinME). Let's hope it will soon be fixed. |
|
SirSteve
Premium Member
join:2003-11-28
Woodbury, CT |
SirSteve
Premium Member
2005-Jun-2 8:42 am
said by Buddel:Hi SirSteve , I have exactly the same problem (also WinME). Let's hope it will soon be fixed. Glad its not just me. |
|
 cork1958Cork
Premium Member
join:2000-02-26 |
to Oremina9
said by Oremina9:Just a quick heads up that in Settings - Ignore products - All products, the following three entries are checked by default and may well be best unchecked. CDilla SideStep New.Net Wonder why they've ALWAYS done this? Usually, it's new.net, sidesearch, and some other one I forget. --
Spread Opera, fastest browser on earth or Cyberspace! |
|
BuddelIf it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Premium Member
join:2004-03-06
EU
kudos:3
1 edit |
Buddel
Premium Member
2005-Jun-2 9:03 am
said by cork1958: Wonder why they've ALWAYS done this? Usually, it's new.net, sidesearch, and some other one I forget. Maybe they should have checked "Nirsoft" instead because I don't think this is malware (see my previous post on page 1 of this thread). |
|
| |
to cork1958
said by cork1958:Wonder why they've ALWAYS done this? Usually, it's new.net, sidesearch, and some other one I forget Cudni has a pretty good theory--
look out kid they keep it all hid |
|
| |
to TeMerc6
Spybot 1.4 takes about 30 seconds to scan IE Favorites and another 30 seconds to scan Firefox favs. Is there a way to exclude the scanning of favorites as I do not use IE any longer? |
|
 captokita
Premium Member
join:2005-02-22
Calabash, NC
kudos:1 |
to TeMerc6
Cool! Nice, easy update. So now we have Adaware 1.06, and a new Spybot! Good week!
What's the Easter Egg BTW? |
|
dadkinsCan you do Blu?
MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA
kudos:18
1 edit |
said by captokita:Cool! Nice, easy update. So now we have Adaware 1.06, and a new Spybot! Good week! What's the Easter Egg BTW? From Net-Integration: Click the little icon at the top,beside the heading: Spybot-Search and Destroy 1.4. If you got it,you'll hear a horse whinny. |
|
:D!!!!!!YAY!!!!!!:D:o
·
