site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
61
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


nohotbar

@35-65.tampabay.res.r

Oh Yea.

Big money looks out for the little guy.

Hope Symantec has big enough ones to stick it out.


cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN
kudos:5
Reviews:
·Frontier FiOS

Big money looks out for 1 and only 1 thing, itself. It's not out to benefit you or me. The corporate bigwigs looked at the situation and decided that it made more financial sense to go after one adware company, wait, make that advertising enhanced browsing experience company, and get a declaratory judgement. If they didn't, there would be a possibility that they could get sued by hundreds of small adware companies in order to remove them from their product. By making the preemptive strike so to speak, my guess is that some potential lawsuits could be put on the back burner waiting for the outcome. If it is favorable for Symantec, then it sets a precedent that wouldn't bode for future adware makers wanting to sue. However, there is still the remote possibility that it could go against Symantec which then has the opposite effect, opening the flood gate for lawsuits.

It has the potential to benefit you, me, Symantec, as well as the whole anti-adware industry, but don't think for a minute that Symantec is doing it for anything else but their bottom line.
--
"What gives them the right to come in and do this?" she said. - Lady complaining that she was getting FIOS in her backyard.


Sunday, 27-May 13:28:35 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics