<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Your Opinion on SpywareGuard in Security</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r13627879</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:36:16 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:36:16 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13634352</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/151802"><b>jaykaykay</b></A> : I use Spyware Guard along with many other things and all have played well with each other.  <br><br> <IMG SRC="http://www.jumsoft.com/jam/samples/layers/Layers.jpg"> <br><br>This is the answer, along with common sense, to many problems that get people into trouble.<br><SMALL>--<br>JKK:-)Age is a very high price to pay for my maturity. If I can't stay young, I can at least stay immature! </SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13634352</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 15:15:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13633237</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/874633"><b>anthrorules</b></A> : Layered security = Good thing<br><br>SpywareGuard = smaller footprint (load on memory) than other competing products, including MS Anti-Spyware, Spybot TeaTimer, SpySweeper, etc.<br><br>For me, I've reduced the number of real-time protection, and I've only used SpywareBlaster, SpywareGuard, Spyware Block List, and MVPS Hosts file, along with AVG AV Resident Protection, and I've not had any problems. I am confident that going with this set of programs helps to protect my Windows operating system computers.<br><br>Of course, for checks and balances, I do check my systems from time to time with MS Anti-Spyware, Spybot Search and Destroy, and Lavasoft Ad-Aware SE, along with Anti-Trojan proggies, like Ewido, TDS-3, and Trojan Remover. I also check my computers with updated AV programs on a daily basis.<br><SMALL>--<br>ionSKY Wireless ISP - 2.4GHz - 802.11b - 1.0MB/384kbps | Dell Dimension 4550/WinXP Pro/SP2/768MB Ram -- Dell Inspiron 5150/WinXP Pro/SP2/512MB Ram |Kerio Personal Firewall 2.1.5 | NAT Router/Firewall | NETGEAR WGT624v2 Wireless Firewall/Router</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13633237</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 12:18:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13633098</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/480424"><b>Spy</b></A> : I stopped using spywareguard for a while when I started using ms antispyware.  However, I feel as though another layer couldn't hurt much especially since it doesn't slow down my system.  Therefore, I'm running it again.  I do not run tea-timer though.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13633098</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 11:55:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13632732</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I use MSAS, WinPatrol, Spybot's Tea Timer, SpywareBlaster and SpywareGuard together without any problems whatsoever. You will get multiple popup warnings at times, but what if you got some malware that disabled MSAS or WinPatrol or whatever? Wouldn't you want a backup running just incase? That's why I run them together even though there is some overlap in protection. Here's a site explaining what each program protects. &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.dozleng.com/updates/index.php?pg=redundant" >www.dozleng.com/updates/index.ph&middot;&middot;&middot;edundant</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13632732</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 10:42:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13631738</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/898280"><b>Jarmo P</b></A> : I still run SpywareGuard.<br><br>A question about Teatimer aka Spybot SD resident.<br>I installed it as an admin, but normally run my XP SP2 using a limited account and I see it not running on systray.<br>So it works only with administrator user accounts?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13631738</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 03:37:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13631372</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/928383"><b>Nogard is me</b></A> : Thanks]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13631372</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 01:38:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13631327</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/974615"><b>mers2</b></A> : He is but the release date is unknown.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13631327</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 01:27:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13631296</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/928383"><b>Nogard is me</b></A> : Thanks. I thought I read somewhere that Javacool is making a new version of spywareguard. Can anyone confirm that?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13631296</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 01:21:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13631274</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1150241"><b>wxboss</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Nogard is me <A HREF="/useremail/u/928383"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR>I don't use it any more. I use MS Anti-spyware. Should I go to spyware gaurd or should I use teatimer. <br> </DIV>Right now I'm using MS Anti-Spyware in conjunction with SpywareGuard. From what I've seen so far, they should compliment each other pretty well.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13631274</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 01:17:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13631223</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/928383"><b>Nogard is me</b></A> : I don't use it any more. I use MS Anti-spyware. Should I go to spyware gaurd or should I use teatimer. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13631223</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 01:04:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13630518</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/937383"><b>TeMerc</b></A> : I guess I stand corrected, thanks for those links guys.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13630518</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 23:06:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13630507</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/327578"><b>hayc59</b></A> : mers2 thanks was just about to post that<br>thread]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13630507</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 23:04:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13630497</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/327578"><b>hayc59</b></A> : ;)<br>I also see no where about not needing updates??<br>I do how ever see a thread about how to update <br>the software 'manually' if needed and how<br>Manually Updating SpywareGuard<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=25749" >www.wilderssecurity.com/showthre&middot;&middot;&middot;?t=25749</A><br><SMALL>--<br>&atilde;r&ecirc; &yen;&Oslash;u &ecirc;xp&ecirc;ri&ecirc;nc&ecirc;D <A HREF="http://members.cox.net/classicweb/Heroes/heroes.htm">9/11/01 Never Forget</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13630497</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 23:03:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13630389</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/974615"><b>mers2</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  TeMerc <A HREF="/useremail/u/937383"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br>SpywareGuard is not supposed to be updated, due to its hueristic scanning engine, read this thread from Javacool which explains why:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=23839" >www.wilderssecurity.com/showthre&middot;&middot;&middot;?t=23839</A><br><br>EDIT: BTW, I have used it on 3 different boxes, one Win 98, , 2 XPs, one home, one Pro, I never hear anything unless I make changes myself(Pro box is test box, its only barked once)Its a great lil app.<br> </DIV>Not completely true.  SpywareGuard used to get regular updates.  I just did a cursory search and couldn't find it, but in addition to the Wilders post Javacool did state in another post somewhere  that SG is at a point where it needs a total rebuild to do any additional updates.  Yes, it is still a good product and still offers protection but it does need updating.<br>Edited:  Found the link: &raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,12411725#12411725">Re: Spywareguard Updates?</A><br><SMALL>--<br>God put me on this Earth to accomplish a certain number of things. Right now, I am so far behind I will never die.<br></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13630389</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:50:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13630332</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/937383"><b>TeMerc</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  mers2 <A HREF="/useremail/u/974615"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR> It's not perfect without current updates but it is one more layer in the layered approach.<br> </DIV>SpywareGuard is not supposed to be updated, due to its hueristic scanning engine, read this thread from Javacool which explains why:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=23839" >www.wilderssecurity.com/showthre&middot;&middot;&middot;?t=23839</A><br><br>EDIT: BTW, I have used it on 3 different boxes, one Win 98, , 2 XPs, one home, one Pro, I never hear anything unless I make changes myself(Pro box is test box, its only barked once)Its a great lil app.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13630332</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:43:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13630027</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/327578"><b>hayc59</b></A> : Its outdated and needs an update<br>but hey it does what its suppose to do ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13630027</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:03:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13629910</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/974615"><b>mers2</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  wxboss <A HREF="/useremail/u/1150241"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br>Thanks for the feedback everyone. I guess I'll throw one more question out there...Have you run into any problems with SG running along side other anti-spyware apps for example, Spybot or MSAS? I'm just wondering if the real time protection provided by two different programs causes any problems or conflicts.<br><br>BTW: that's a great link mers2. Considering how recent the tests were done, I'm convinced SG is still doing its job.<br> </DIV>I've never had a problem with SG with Spybot or Counterspy when either has been running resident protection.  SG has always seemed to play nice with other security programs.  Javacool does good work. <br><SMALL>--<br>God put me on this Earth to accomplish a certain number of things. Right now, I am so far behind I will never die.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13629910</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 21:48:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13629797</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1150241"><b>wxboss</b></A> : Thanks for the feedback everyone. I guess I'll throw one more question out there...Have you run into any problems with SG running along side other anti-spyware apps for example, Spybot or MSAS? I'm just wondering if the real time protection provided by two different programs causes any problems or conflicts.<br><br>BTW: that's a great link mers2. Considering how recent the tests were done, I'm convinced SG is still doing its job.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13629797</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 21:35:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13629289</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1056836"><b>ravencajun</b></A> : I used to have it and really liked it. But for some reason when I got my Verizon software installed suddenly the spyware guard started going nuts because of course the Verizon changed my homepage which was ok with me and I told it to allow that but it would not let it happen kept popping up like mad and then my CPU usage went to 100% and would stay there as long as I had the spywareguard on.  I tried removing the program totally and doing a reinstall but it did the exact same thing 100% CPU so I can no longer run it had to delete it.<br><br>I do have spywareblaster and it is fine.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13629289</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:32:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13629190</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/543105"><b>ChrisJT</b></A> : Like what everyone else stated, I also use SG in lieu with other programs.<br><SMALL>--<br>You get what you pay for.<BR>Socom2: [BBR] DocT</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13629190</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:21:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13628255</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/380499"><b>lawilson2</b></A> : I used Spywareguard and really liked it. However, I've found that the Teatimer in Spybot combined with MS Antispyware nearly seals my computer from any spyware (I do use Spywareblaster as well).  I haven't had spyware in literally months with these combinations.<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://www.wilsonedutech.com/techforum">Wilson EduTech, Inc. Forum</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13628255</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:34:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13628181</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/627054"><b>boblandy</b></A> : what  mers2 <A HREF="/useremail/u/974615"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> said]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13628181</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:25:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13628104</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/974615"><b>mers2</b></A> : A comparison of anti-spyware applications versus Hotbar was done here: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.dozleng.com/updates/index.php?showtopic=5275" >www.dozleng.com/updates/index.ph&middot;&middot;&middot;pic=5275</A> and SpywareGuard did it's job and prevented it from being installed.  It's not perfect without current updates but it is one more layer in the layered approach.<br><SMALL>--<br>God put me on this Earth to accomplish a certain number of things. Right now, I am so far behind I will never die.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13628104</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:15:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13628060</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1049966"><b>crossedeyed</b></A> : run it myself and it has cut down on the spyware.  I also had concerns over it's updating but I make sure my other proggies stay up to date.<br><SMALL>--<br>Vertically-Challenged Arkansas. A family, a way of life, period.   Better built than bought</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13628060</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:09:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13628021</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : I use SpywareGaurd(and a few others) on both of my machines.<br><br>While other apps have similar protections, I still see SG popup a warning from time to time(that tells me it's still effective). I like having it there in my mix of anti-crapware arsenal. ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13628021</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:04:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Your Opinion on SpywareGuard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13627879</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1150241"><b>wxboss</b></A> : I've been using SpywareBlaster (which is a great product), so I thought I would try out SpywareGuard, but I have a few concerns:<br><br>1) I know that SpywareGuard uses heuristics to identify spyware, but the latest definitions date for it is 1/22/04. That just seems a little too outdated to me.<br><br>2) Is anyone else currently using this program (or tried it in the past) and has any comments on its effectiveness for what it is designed to do.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13627879</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:48:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
