<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: While we&#x27;re looking at the USF.... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r13672261</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:16:47 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:16:47 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: While we&#x27;re looking at the USF....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13672261</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/141383"><b>Karl Bode</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>This is not a government charge or tax, and it does not end up in the government&#146;s treasury.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>It's telco revenue with a dressed up name.  Doesn't go to the FCC at all.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13672261</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:51:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: While we&#x27;re looking at the USF....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13672239</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/203342"><b>Mike</b></A> : The FCC can;<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/charges.html" >www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/charges.html</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13672239</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:47:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>While we&#x27;re looking at the USF....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13672221</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/493115"><b>StudioTech</b></A> : Let's take a look at the FCC subscriber charge on regular phone bills. Can someone explain that one?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13672221</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:45:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
