site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
2565
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies


lastdaysofthesupreme

@nycmny.fios.verizon.

reply to Vamp

Waning influence...

The last days of the supreme court (notice the lower case for supreme court). I'm sure they know that ALL legal decisions won by the industry are part of a losing battle as broadband speeds get faster, and faster, and faster, and faster and the tactics of the movie industry get sleezier, and sleezier and sleezier... what next? they'll charge you money to watch a tailer or preview like PPV?!?!? WTF already...

You can't late term abort a broadband revolution!
What's that song, too much, too little, too late, you ain't never gonna get that genie back into the bottle again?


IT Guy
Ow, My Balls
Premium
join:2004-07-29
Las Cruces, NM
Reviews:
·Comcast

reply to snot on your life

Re: Thats stupid..

Especially now that local municipalities looking to expand their property (and subsequently their tax base) can bull-doze your place down, if you don't want to sell it off. Thank GW for granting local politicians the right to invoke eminent domain and put their citizens out on their ass.


boog
Premium
join:2000-07-24
Trenton, OH

Your off topic, and GW didn't grant anything in that. It was the supreme court, and how many supreme court judges had GW appointed? if you look here »www.supremecourtus.gov/about/bio···rent.pdf they were appointed by Regan, Ford, George Herbert Walker Bush, and Clinton, and if you look into their histories, they mostly lean to the liberal side. They are all old and out of touch in my opinion, just think how easy it is to get your grandpa or grandma scared/worked up over something that they don't understand....

If you don't want you local politicians to be able to bulldoze your house, you better participate in your local government!



IT Guy
Ow, My Balls
Premium
join:2004-07-29
Las Cruces, NM

Cripes... It's all a matter of semantics with you people. Lighten up and pull your head out of the sand. The CURRENT administration let it go through.



boog
Premium
join:2000-07-24
Trenton, OH

so, the current administration can stop the supreme court?



IT Guy
Ow, My Balls
Premium
join:2004-07-29
Las Cruces, NM

Why would they want to? It's packed with conservatives and they are ruling the way the administration wants them to. The new bankruptcy laws are a good case-in-point.



Kaltes
Premium
join:2002-12-04
Los Angeles, CA

reply to IT Guy

moronic, contrived Bush bashing

said by IT Guy:

Especially now that local municipalities looking to expand their property (and subsequently their tax base) can bull-doze your place down, if you don't want to sell it off. Thank GW for granting local politicians the right to invoke eminent domain and put their citizens out on their ass.
#1. Bush has NOTHING to do with the Supreme Court

#2. THE LIBERALS ON THE COURT are wholly responsible for "granting local politicians the right to invoke eminent domain and put their citizens out on their ass", EVERY CONSERVATIVE JUSTICE dissented from that opinion!

said by IT Guy:

Cripes... It's all a matter of semantics with you people. Lighten up and pull your head out of the sand. The CURRENT administration let it go through.
You lighten up and YOU pull your head out of the sand, and while you are at it go back to 2nd grade and learn how our federal government works. You must have missed school the day the teacher went over seperation of powers, checks and balances, stuff like that.

said by IT Guy:

It's packed with conservatives and they are ruling the way the administration wants them to.
Wrong and wrong. There are 4 liberals and 3 conservatives, with 2 swing votes. 'Packed with conservatives' my ass. Your ignorance of both basic civics as well as the most rudimentary info on a court you rant about in your quest to attack Bush is astounding.


boog
Premium
join:2000-07-24
Trenton, OH

reply to IT Guy

Re: Thats stupid..

I bet you also think the president can make more jobs around the country too!


tapeloop
Not bad at all, really.
Premium
join:2004-06-27
Airstrip One
kudos:1

reply to Kaltes

Re: moronic, contrived Bush bashing

said by Kaltes:

#1. Bush has NOTHING to do with the Supreme Court
Wow Kaltes, switch to decaf, eh?

If it weren't for the Supreme Court, Bush likely wouldn't even be in office now.

And Bush does appoint S.C. justices (i.e. Rehnquist's replacement).

But true, he has nothing to do with the SCOTUS' current rulings. One could argue that he has influence over some of the conservative justices like Scalia, but that's more Cheney's bailiwick. (quack )
--
Copyright infringement is illegal. Murder is illegal. Therefore, file sharing is murder.


IT Guy
Ow, My Balls
Premium
join:2004-07-29
Las Cruces, NM
Reviews:
·Comcast

reply to Kaltes
No matter what you little Bush minions have to say is irrelevant to me. It's the same crap I hear spew out of your mouths everyday with your so-called legitimate media, Faux News brainwashing. To sum it up, you're just wasting your breath. Bush and his admin SHOULD have NOTHING to do with the S.C. But government is so crooked, that it isn't the way it works in practice.



Kaltes
Premium
join:2002-12-04
Los Angeles, CA

reply to tapeloop

said by tapeloop:

If it weren't for the Supreme Court, Bush likely wouldn't even be in office now.
False. An investigation of the Florida ballots confirms that had the US Supreme Court not intervened to overrule the Florida Supreme Court's illegal order to continue counting ballots, Bush would have won ANYWAY.
said by tapeloop:

And Bush does appoint S.C. justices (i.e. Rehnquist's replacement).
Bush has not appointed anyone to the USSC. This means Bush has, to date, had nothing to do with the US Supreme Court.
said by tapeloop:

But true, he has nothing to do with the SCOTUS' current rulings.
This is obvious, except to partisan liberals hell-bent on attacking Bush.
said by tapeloop:

One could argue that he has influence over some of the conservative justices like Scalia, but that's more Cheney's bailiwick.
Scalia can be friends with whoever he likes, that does not mean Cheney writes Scalia's opinions.
said by IT Guy:

No matter what you little Bush minions have to say is irrelevant to me. It's the same crap I hear spew out of your mouths everyday with your so-called legitimate media, Faux News brainwashing. To sum it up, you're just wasting your breath. Bush and his admin SHOULD have NOTHING to do with the S.C. But government is so crooked, that it isn't the way it works in practice.
Of course every good nutjob has to discredit every voice or reason as an agent of some evil shadowy conspiracy, otherwise some common sense might leak into your thinking and throw your whole freakish funhouse-mirror worldview upside-down.


tapeloop
Not bad at all, really.
Premium
join:2004-06-27
Airstrip One
kudos:1

good to the last drop

Well, I should have known better than to jump in the middle of a bipartisan rant.

IT Guy: You won't win your argument with dogma, unsupported conjectures and name-calling.

Kaltes: You won't win your argument with dogma, unnecessarily caustic speech and name-calling.

Switching to decaf does wonders. Green tea is even better.

If anyone wants me, I'll be outside getting some sun. The LCD screen ain't cuttin' it.
--
Copyright infringement is illegal. Murder is illegal. Therefore, file sharing is murder.

Sunday, 27-May 15:32:55 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics