 KaltesPremium
join:2002-12-04
Los Angeles, CA | reply to fiberguy
Re: Betamax has been overturned said by fiberguy: Basically, it was stated that Betas intent was for personal use. The intent of the file sharing system was to transport data between users and has greater potential for abuse. "transport data between users" is also personal use.  whatever those people were trying to say, whatever point they were trying to get across, you clearly didn't get it.
said by fiberguy:So, I guess you are right, judges speaking on it are just a bunch of non-lawyers that don't know case law. Those people you supposedly saw on tv might know what they are talking about. You clearly do not. |
fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3 | Wow! I guess you told me..
It clear that you don't know either, since you had nothing to add!
It's really lame to post the "you don't know what you are talking about" if you, yourself, are not going to add anything, so I will leave it at that.
However, what I posted was nothing more than what they said, and I agree with them. |
