N3EVL
join:2004-12-13
Shrewsbury, MA | Anything definitive on Interference at Cincinnati? I had heard positive things regarding the apparent lack of interference to HF at the Cincinnati test site but seem to remember reading a posting recently from someone in the affected area stating that the interference was present and significant. Does anyone have definitive info regarding interference at this location?
Maybe it was this hardware/location that was limiting itself to low VHF and/or notching the amateur bands. I don't have much use for the notching approach since it just pushes the problem into someone else's domain (assuming it even works). I also doubt that all users of this hardware will forever limit themselves to a relatively narrow chunk of spectrum - they'll eventually want/need the HF part for additional bandwidth - then watch the complaints surface!
I always though Google was a technically savvy organization but this decision makes me wonder - I hope they know what they're getting into with this technology. |
|
| none... in Philadelphia, Virginia and some other rolled out places !!!
Thanks Google for the BPL investment !!!! |
|
|
|
| said by bpl4all:
none... in Philadelphia, Virginia and some other rolled out places !!!
Thanks Google for the BPL investment !!!!
There is no BPL in Philadelphia; they're rolling out wireless. If you're talking about Manassas, VA, there were at least six FCC filings regarding interference from that site. |
|
N3EVL
join:2004-12-13
Shrewsbury, MA | reply to bpl4all
said by bpl4all:
none... in Philadelphia, Virginia and some other rolled out places !!!
Thanks Google for the BPL investment !!!!
As rf-engineer pointed out your response is lacking in both accuracy and precision. Based on the quality of your input to this debate and Google's surprising selection of this technology, perhaps we can assume that they came to you for investment advice?
|
|
