site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
383
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


An2

@dixie-net.com

250k in three years?!

Wow...no wonder its taking so long for dial-up to die. Broadband companies refuse to get it in gear and make the necessary moves to make sure there's no honest reason NOT to get broadband. Between SBC and its 15 dollar deal being in like, six states, and BPL moving as slow as frozen molasses, we're getting nowhere.

BPL could easily be deployed in rural areas (like where I live--eleven miles away from the nearest CO). Everyone has electricity, and from what I've read, there's no extreme process required to install it...unlike Cable. (Which I've waited nearly 2 months for.) But they seem intent on being permanently small-time, and it seems the only way for people in rural areas to get broadband is to either wait or move.

mAlfunkti0n

join:2003-12-16
Loveland, OH

LOL two months waiting for cable so far eh? I waited over 3 years for my first DSL service. It all comes down to money, if they cant make enough, they wont offer the service for a long time.



rawgerz
The hell was that?
Premium
join:2004-10-03
Grove City, PA

if they do it right and replace all the lines with shielded wires i can understand a 3 year time frame but why bother replacing the lines if you can just use fiber?


Sunday, 27-May 16:39:18 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics