<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: $100,000 a bit pricey in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r13834227</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:22:13 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:22:13 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: $100,000 a bit pricey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13852029</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Even if you use Jupiter Research's figure of $150,000 per square mile over five years, that works out to $30,000 per square mile per year.  There could easily be 3,000 people living within a square mile in an urban area.  That works out to $10/year/person, which is less than $1/month/person.  <br><br>So, how many people will actually subscribe in order to calculate the cost per subscriber?  At a cost of less than $1/month I don't think there should be a subscription fee.  The cost of the fee collection and administration wouldn't make it worth while.  Would a 50% subscription rate for free broadband wireless be feasible?  What would the value to the community be for that?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13852029</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2005 18:13:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: $100,000 a bit pricey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13834603</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/605287"><b>verolom</b></A> : Well, at 300 feet range (424 feet square), one needs more like 155 APs to cover a square mile (5280 feet per mile) * $50 a month that's $7750 a month, times 60 months (5 years) that's  $465,000.<br><br>So maybe the muni solution is cheaper :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13834603</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 14:17:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: $100,000 a bit pricey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13834348</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/605287"><b>verolom</b></A> : On the other token it would be nice to stay on the 8th floor of the Hyatt Regency and not having to pay extra $10 per day for i-net access ;)<br><br>I assume they include the rights to position the access points, the wired infrastructure (signal, power), network access, operation and maintenance.<br><br>Yep, pricey...  On the other side if say 20 people share their $50 a month cable connection to cover that square mile, that's only $1000 a month... What am I missing?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13834348</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 13:48:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: $100,000 a bit pricey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13834227</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1031550"><b>tapeloop</b></A> : Have to agree with you there Wacoyle.  While I think that it's onerous for Verizon to hijack state legislation, and while it'd be nice to have citywide wi-fi, it'd be even nicer to not have a gaping hole in South Street bridge. :uhh:<br><SMALL>--<br>Copyright infringement is illegal. Murder is illegal. Therefore, file sharing is murder.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13834227</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 13:34:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>$100,000 a bit pricey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13834162</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/897844"><b>N3OGH</b></A> : A $100K a square mile's a lot of money to spend for a city (Philadelphia) that can't educate it's children without the intervention of the state, and talks about closing firehouses on a yearly basis.<br><br>What's the point of having broadband if your laptop is smoldering trash???<br><br>I have nothing against muni projects per se, and I see a genuine need for it in a lot of areas.  Neither am I dismissing the service this could bring to the poorer areas of the city, I'm simply asking myself why a city that constantly pisses and moans they don't have enough money to sustain basic social services is getting into the business of running a broadband network...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13834162</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 13:25:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
