<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: . in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r13835606</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:10:02 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:10:02 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: .</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13835606</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/856950"><b>jap</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  techjoe <A HREF="/useremail/u/956875"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR>Not quite sure where he was going  with that remark.</DIV> I took it to be a comment on the inherent instability of RF, not the human management or implementation factors that, as you say, can FUBAR any form of technology.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13835606</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:19:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13835257</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/956875"><b>techjoe</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>Some things are clear. Wireless can be very cheap (if slow and not rock-solid reliable)<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>So can DSL, cable, and cars. Not quite sure where he was going  with that remark. :uhh:<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://www.clanc.cc">www.clanc.cc</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13835257</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 15:37:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
