<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>huh? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r13836139</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 21:34:37 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 21:34:37 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>huh?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13836139</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/856950"><b>jap</b></A> : Study sez: <I>"... <B>even if</B> the benefit of the initiative is assumed to be $25 per user per month"</I><br><br>Even if?  Bullocks!<br>I pay 60$/mo for Adelphia internet-only connectivity over old, oxidized, TV coax.  How the eff is the suggestion of 25$/mo outrageous?  I'd happily pay half-again that for burried fiber connectivity-only from a muni that employs people in my town and doesn't try to bundle heaven & earth into the deal. I know this particular example is aimed at wireless, but that's only because wireless happens to be the perceived muni-threat of the moment: they play the same fear mongering, mis-info game when buried fiber is the threat.<br><br>The biggest bitch of private sector connectivity is I cannot buy it without buying something else from that company and the money all leaves my town, my county, my state, and even my country.  I'm not an anti-globalists, but if my money is going to leave my community then I want a product-benefit for it, not a product-penalty.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13836139</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 17:23:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
