N3EVL
join:2004-12-13
Shrewsbury, MA | reply to P Ness
Re: Oh No interference!! Do you really expect ALL of the users affected by this interference to buy this "needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" crap?
What gives you the right to trample over the irreplaceble natural resource as represented by the HF spectrum and the low-infrastructure worldwide communications it makes possible?
I'll fight long and hard to protect my licensed rights to the little bit of HF that I'm granted access to by part 97 and anticipate the users of the rest of the HF spectrum that this sorry technology would trash would do likewise.
Whether or not you have a RIGHT to broadand is an interesting subject to debate -but- I do NOT recognize your right to have broadband AT ANY COST. |
|
|
|
 63353372Premium
join:2003-06-18
Canada
kudos:1
2 edits | Nevermind... |
|
| said by 63353372:said by N3EVL:Do you really expect ALL of the users affected by this interference to buy this "needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" crap? What gives you the right to trample over the irreplaceble natural resource as represented by the HF spectrum and the low-infrastructure worldwide communications it makes possible? I'll fight long and hard to protect my licensed rights to the little bit of HF that I'm granted access to by part 97 and anticipate the users of the rest of the HF spectrum that this sorry technology would trash would do likewise. Whether or not you have a RIGHT to broadand is an interesting subject to debate -but- I do NOT recognize your right to have broadband AT ANY COST. How do you determine you have a right to your ancient, shitty technology that no one else gives a f*ck about? It's been said a million times here, but bears repeating.... ham radio uses only 10% of the spectrum affected by HF BPL. The rest is government, military, maritime, aeronautical, and international broadcast.
I realize you're a troll, but have you looked at how crappy BPL technology is before you go throwing stones? Of all the broadband delivery methods, it's the sloppiest and least reliable built on the shakiest regulations and most unsuitable, oldest transport medium. |
|
N3EVL
join:2004-12-13
Shrewsbury, MA | reply to 63353372
Sounds like the last gasp attempt to justify a failed technology that couldn't escape into denial any longer and is now blatantly attempting to bulldoze its way through any legitimate opposition.
I see no need to justify the current state of Amatur Radio technology to self-styled "techies" - there is abundant reading material that would convince you otherwise, should you have the mental capacity to do the necessary research.
My justification to transmit and receive on the affected frequencies is clearly defined in Part 97. Similarly the limitiations under which BPL must operate are clearly defined in Part 15.
If the BPL industry is relying on shyster legal tricks to gain a foothold in the market (having apparently abandoned any attempt at selling itself on its technical merits - and who can blame it?) then it is indeed in deep trouble - such strategies are likely to be ponderously slow and we can all hope that BPL is left in its own legal dust as better technologies overtake it. |
|
| reply to 63353372
said by 63353372:How do you determine you have a right to your ancient, shitty technology that no one else gives a f*ck about? Ham radio is under Part 97 of the Code of Federal Regulations. BPL is under Part 15. Read up. |
|
 FLECOMBay Networks FreakPremium
join:2003-03-03
Miami, FL
 ·AT&T DSL Service
2 edits | reply to 63353372
said by 63353372:said by N3EVL:Do you really expect ALL of the users affected by this interference to buy this "needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" crap? What gives you the right to trample over the irreplaceble natural resource as represented by the HF spectrum and the low-infrastructure worldwide communications it makes possible? I'll fight long and hard to protect my licensed rights to the little bit of HF that I'm granted access to by part 97 and anticipate the users of the rest of the HF spectrum that this sorry technology would trash would do likewise. Whether or not you have a RIGHT to broadand is an interesting subject to debate -but- I do NOT recognize your right to have broadband AT ANY COST. How do you determine you have a right to your ancient, shitty technology that no one else gives a f*ck about? you mean that ancient shitty technology that people like the red cross use during distasters? that many branches of the military use for mobile communications? that government and other large users use? its not just hams, jackass, do some research first 
--
BellSouth sucks |
|
