<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Informal Adware Risk Survey in Security</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r13912417</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:56:46 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:56:46 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13970404</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/953591"><b>Mowergun</b></A> : I have no first hand experience with any of those listed except new.net.  <br><br>I have removed "about" easily from a relative's computer using aboutbuster and hyjackthis.  I have removed new.net and comet cursor from another relative's computer. I had my own experience with Conducent Timesync and Webhancer when they first appeared a few years ago.<br><br>So, I am not qualified to rank the twelve threats listed.  I am surprised that so many rated new.net so high.  As I understand it new.net usually appears in add/remove and the uninstaller does a pretty good job of uninstalling new.net. For those installs that do not appear in add/remove, new.net provides pretty good instructions along with a down-loadable uninstaller at &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.newdotnet.com/removal.html" >www.newdotnet.com/removal.html</A>.  Of course if you use a ready made hosts file, chances are it has a redirection to your local machine for the new.net domain so you cannot access the new.net removal instructions or download the uninstaller. Sort of shooting yourself in the foot.<br><br>A couple of people have mentioned that an improper removal of new.net can break a users internet connectivity due to the removal of LSP's without restoring continuity to the remaining LSP's.  My understanding is that this is usually caused by the improper removal of the LSP by some anti-spyware program. I would blame the anti-spyware program for that, especially when an effective uninstaller is readily available, and also because this is an old known issue. Any anti-spyware program that is still improperly removing new.net and breaking a users internet connectivity, I would not regard as trustworthy.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13970404</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:17:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13966929</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1234284"><b>Uncle Jean</b></A> : OK and I thank you, Eric.  Yes, interesting and informative.<br><br>Regards,<br>UJ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13966929</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2005 16:04:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13966582</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/378696"><b>eburger68</b></A> : Jean:<br><br>There's no single "right list," but I will post the list as I called it:<br><br>1. CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br>2. SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br>3. ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br>4. IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br>5. 180search Assistant<br>6. New.net<br>7. GAIN OfferCompanion<br>8. Hotbar<br>9. WhenU Save!<br>10. Weatherbug<br>11. Download Accelerator Plus<br>12. Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br><br>A few observations:<br><br>1) Most users who posted here or on Suzi's blog came up with rankings that generally resemble the above. Here and there folks ranked a particular program vastly differently than I did, but if you look over all the rankings, a general pattern emerges and my list certainly fits the pattern.<br><br>2) This survey was obviously non-scientific and highly biased, as the respondents were entirely self-selected. The folks who would respond to such a survey would tend to be people who already had some familiarity with the programs involved, unlike the vast majority of "normal" users.<br><br>3) Despite the self-selection, there were a few people who posted who admitted that they recognized one or two programs, but that the majority of them were an undifferentiable mass, given their general unfamiliarity with the software. I suspect this would be the case with the majority of "normal" users.<br><br>4) It needs to be reiterated that my list should not be taken as the definitive list, that there is plenty of room for disagreement. Most disagreements among knowledgeable folks, I expect, would stem from different weightings given to various functionality and behavior associated with the programs. Some people regard LSP hijackers as more dangerous than others, for example, and would tend to push New.net further up the list than others would based on that functionality.<br><br>In any case, I hope readers here found this informal survey interesting, informative, and thought-provoking.<br><br>Best regards,<br><br>Eric L. Howes]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13966582</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2005 15:09:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13966486</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/917630"><b>Cudni</b></A> : I would like to post the list, however, as it is constantly being adjusted/lowered maybe ...;)<br><br>Cudni<br><SMALL>--<br>Help yourself so God can help you</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13966486</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2005 14:54:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13966394</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1234284"><b>Uncle Jean</b></A> : Hi all,<br><br>I'd just like to know if Eric will post here what he considers to be "the right list".<br><br>Thanks,<br>UJ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13966394</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2005 14:39:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13958766</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/937383"><b>TeMerc</b></A> : Here is my .02 on the list:<br>ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br>SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br>CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br>180search Assistant<br>IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br>Hotbar<br>GAIN OfferCompanion<br>WhenU Save!<br>New.net<br>Download Accelerator Plus<br>Weatherbug<br>Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br><br>This is pretty much based on experiences with users removing each, how easy\difficult they were to rid.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13958766</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 14:40:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13955840</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1227769"><b>dalek9</b></A> : Ignore my first post, I had the numbers backwards, consider this one the correct post.<br><br>&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;Rank<br>180search Assistant&#9;&#9;&#9;1<br>IBIS Websearch/Wintools&#9;&#9;&#9;2<br>CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)&#9;3<br>Hotbar&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;4<br>Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)&#9;&#9;5<br>New.net&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;6<br>SearchMiracle/Elitebar&#9;&#9;&#9;7<br>GAIN OfferCompanion&#9;&#9;&#9;8<br>WhenU Save!&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;9<br>ABetterInternet (Aurora)&#9;&#9;10<br>Download Accelerator Plus&#9;&#9;11<br>Weatherbug&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;12]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13955840</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 07:19:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13955826</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1227769"><b>dalek9</b></A> : &#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;Rank<br>Weatherbug&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;1<br>Download Accelerator Plus&#9;&#9;2<br>ABetterInternet (Aurora)&#9;&#9;3<br>WhenU Save!&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;4<br>GAIN OfferCompanion&#9;&#9;&#9;5<br>SearchMiracle/Elitebar&#9;&#9;&#9;6<br>New.net&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;7<br>Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)&#9;&#9;8<br>Hotbar&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;9<br>CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)&#9;10<br>IBIS Websearch/Wintools&#9;&#9;&#9;11<br>180search Assistant&#9;&#9;&#9;12]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13955826</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 07:15:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13943867</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/679515"><b>CalamityJane</b></A> : Heh!  I have your names now and know you're registered....sometimes I have to put a call in to the Calvary on a difficult infection and ~gets out pencil~ to jot you in :D<br>mu-ahahahahahahahaha<br><br>So, back to topic before I'm busted, many thanks for your input on Eric's survey here :)<br><SMALL>--<br>It takes a disaster to make a woman out of a female<BR><A HREF="http://forum.gladiator-antivirus.com">Gladiator Security Forum</A><BR>Proud Member of <A HREF="http://asap.maddoktor2.com/">ASAP </A> (Alliance of Security Analysis Professionals)</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13943867</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 21:16:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13943767</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/886056"><b>Trpm</b></A> : Hey there Calamity,<br><br>Nice to see you as always!<br>I have been reading this board off and on for awhile, just never posted much. (Member since 2003-10-11.) <br><br>Rex :) ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13943767</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 21:04:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13943265</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/679515"><b>CalamityJane</b></A> : Wow!  Hi Rex, welcome to BBR/DSLR :)  Another great talent shows up in this thread!  Glad to see you here!! :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13943265</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 20:07:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13943250</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/886056"><b>Trpm</b></A> : It's a tough call between ABetterInternet and CoolWebSearch for 1st place, but here it goes.<br><br>CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br>ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br>IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br>SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br>180search Assistant<br>New.net<br>GAIN OfferCompanion<br>Hotbar<br>WhenU Save<br>Download Accelerator Plus<br>Weatherbug<br>Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br><br>Rex :) ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13943250</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 20:04:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13943096</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/304237"><b>keith2468</b></A> : 1. CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br><br>2. WhenU Save!<br><br>3. ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br>180search Assistant<br>SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br>Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br>New.net<br>IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br>GAIN OfferCompanion<br>Hotbar<br><br>4. Download Accelerator Plus<br><br>I don't regard Weatherbug as malware -- by my definition.  <br><br>I tested Weatherbug myself several months ago, and regardless of the fact that my KAV labelled it as adware, and regardless of the fact that an Ad-aware SE scan removed a registry entry required for its uninstall to work, because:<br>(a) it came with a working un-install utility (that worked when I didn't let Ad-aware and KAV muck with it), and <br>(b) because it didn't appear to do any more tracking than a  browser with a tracking cookie, and<br>(c) even after being on my machine for 12 hours I didn't see anything else install (so no unauthorized installs of other software).<br><br>Weatherbug may have changed since then.  Since it doesn't cover weather in Canada, I uninstalled Weatherbug after my tests.<br><SMALL>--<br>(<A HREF="/faq/8428">Virus&Hijacking FAQ</A> + <A HREF="/faq/security/edit/8428#submit">Submit suspected malware</A> + <A HREF="/faq/10194">Backups FAQ</A> + <A HREF="/faq/security">Security FAQ TOC</A>)</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13943096</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:46:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13943004</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : To me, a snake is a snake no matter what size and shape. Even a tracking cookie has no place in my world as I refuse to let anyone profile my unique individual habits for any reason. Nor do I allow any process to take control of any aspect of my sys without my personal cfg.<br><br>So I ask; What difference does it make which order of severity you find them? They are all snakes.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13943004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:35:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Welcome miekiemoes!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13942268</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/679515"><b>CalamityJane</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  miekiemoes <A HREF="/useremail/u/1235187"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br>Still trying to find out how this board works. :D<br> </DIV>So are we!  {just kidding but the custom board features <I>can be a challenge</I>}  If you ever need help or have a question feel free to click on my name and send me an IM :)<br><br>For those here who don't know her, miekiemoes <A HREF="/useremail/u/1235187"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> is an extremely talented spyware removal specialist and researcher (and a very nice lady)! We're honored to see you here :)<br><SMALL>--<br>It takes a disaster to make a woman out of a female<BR><A HREF="http://forum.gladiator-antivirus.com">Gladiator Security Forum</A><BR>Proud Member of <A HREF="http://asap.maddoktor2.com/">ASAP </A> (Alliance of Security Analysis Professionals)</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13942268</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 17:58:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Welcome miekiemoes!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13942177</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1235187"><b>miekiemoes</b></A> : My pleasure. Still trying to find out how this board works. :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13942177</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 17:50:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13934849</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/555588"><b>LoPhatPhuud</b></A> : Aurora, CWS,and Elitebar, to me, are real close. I would say the persistance award for being the biggest PITA for the longest time goes to CWS.<br><br>Anyway, here is my ranking...<br><br>ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br><br>CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br><br>SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br><br>IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br><br>New.net<br><br>180search Assistant<br><br>WhenU Save!<br><br>Hotbar<br><br>GAIN OfferCompanion<br><br>Weatherbug<br><br>Download Accelerator Plus<br><br>Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br><SMALL>--<br>When angry count four; when very angry, swear.<BR><BR><br>Microsoft MVP Windows-Security 2005<BR><br><A HREF="http://forum.gladiator-antivirus.com">Gladiator Security Forum</A><BR></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13934849</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 21:41:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13933996</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : all of these items are direct intrusions on a personal computer.<br><br>aren't you the one screwing around on the ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES  support website that tried to remove something from a compromised computer and you replied that you did not need supervision?<br><br>i think you are.<br><br>you sure get around.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13933996</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 20:02:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13928822</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : OK. Here is my two cents starting with the worst to least offender!<br><br>CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br>ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br>SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br>IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br>180search Assistant<br>New.net<br>WhenU Save!<br>GAIN OfferCompanion<br>Hotbar<br>Download Accelerator Plus<br>Weatherbug<br>Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13928822</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:40:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Welcome miekiemoes!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13928673</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/679515"><b>CalamityJane</b></A> : [OT] miekiemoes, Welcome to Broadband Reports (aka DSLReports...DSLR)<br><br>Nice to see you here :)  Thanks for your input.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13928673</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:09:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13928587</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1235187"><b>miekiemoes</b></A> : My list:<br><br>CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br>ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br>SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br>IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br>Hotbar<br>180search Assistant<br>New.net<br>WhenU Save!<br>GAIN OfferCompanion<br>Download Accelerator Plus<br>Weatherbug<br>Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13928587</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 08:51:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13927905</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/693977"><b>bcastner</b></A> : ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br>CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br>SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br>IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br>New.net<br>180search Assistant<br>GAIN OfferCompanion<br>WhenU Save<br>Hotbar<br>Download Accelerator Plus<br>Weatherbug]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13927905</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 04:09:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13927318</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/999833"><b>suzi</b></A> : I'd rate these three at the top of the list, just about tied based on personal experience, having downloaded them for testing, and due to difficulty in removal & pervasiveness with what I've seen in HijackThis logs on SWW. I've never before seen such anger, as CalamityJane noted, toward any spyware/adware as people have expressed about Aurora.  There are over 100 angry comments on my blog about Aurora including people posting death wishes and thoughts of violence against DirectRevenue.  I've seen some anger toward CWS, but nothing like I've seen toward DirectRevenue (Abetterinternet).  SearchMiracle/Elitebar has a nasty habit of hiding and being invisible to detection with usual methods. I've had the second group, too, and though they are extremely annoying, they are not that difficult to get rid of. <br><br>ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br>CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br>SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br><br>Then, in this order:<br>IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br>180search Assistant<br>New.net<br>GAIN OfferCompanion<br>Hotbar<br>WhenU Save!<br><br>Very low risk, about even:<br>Download Accelerator Plus<br>Weatherbug<br>Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br><SMALL>--<br>aka Suzi, Spyware Warrior<BR>Microsoft MVP Windows Security 2005</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13927318</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 01:10:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13925199</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1224881"><b>wng_z3r0</b></A> : ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br>IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br>CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br>SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br>Hotbar<br>180search Assistant<br>WhenU Save!<br>GAIN OfferCompanion<br>New.net<br>Weatherbug<br>Download Accelerator Plus<br>Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br><br>reasons:<br>1. Nail is a pain in the but to remove, and it causes havoc on computer.<br>2. wintools. This is kinda tied with CWS, but wintools is so freaking unstable, and the OS suffers greatly from the program<br>3. Note above comments<br>4. Elitebar is also a pain to remove. It acts like a rootkit in the sense that it loads itself in the memory so it can't be deleted, and then reincarnates itself.<br>5. This is kinda a tie with elitebar, but it is slightly easier to remove.<br>6-8 These are middle of the road crapware. They are pretty much a tie IMO<br>9 new.net hijacks the LSP chain, making it sometimes dangerous to remove by the uninformed.<br>10. WB displays popups, and I dont trust the creators<br>11. DAP is completely harmless, except for a few popups<br>12. A cookie is... a big yawn IMHO. easy to take care of, and not dangerous<br><br>wng]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13925199</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:46:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13919613</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1225580"><b>ilago</b></A> : 1. ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br>2. CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br>3. 180search Assistant<br>4. SearchMiracle/Elitebar <br>5. IBIS Websearch/Wintools <br>6. GAIN OfferCompanion<br>7. New.net<br>8. WhenU Save!<br>9. Download Accelerator Plus<br>10. Hotbar<br>11. Weatherbug<br>12. Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br><br>I'm a Malware remover on a couple of other forums so I have based my list on that experience, rather than personal experience. I have chosen to install several of these products to work with removal methods. <br><br>They are all gross abuse of personal property - your computer. Coowebsearch and Aurora are, to me, in the same class as housebreakers.:mad: They have no redeeming features.<br><br>However, if you have installed sponsored software then you have a resonsibility to remove the software that was only available through the sponsorship - Messenger Plus! 3, for example, has a sponsor infection, lop.com, that is not in the list above. That is the price of the free software. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13919613</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 07:27:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13919575</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br>SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br>IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br>CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br>180search Assistant<br>Hotbar<br>GAIN OfferCompanion<br>WhenU Save!<br>Download Accelerator Plus<br>Weatherbug<br>Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br>New.net<br><br>I put them in that order based on how annoying they are, how difficult it is to remove and how often they pop up ads or simply crash the machine. If you had included Virtual Bouncer, I would have put that at the top just for being so annoying.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13919575</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 07:14:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13918843</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/486454"><b>Curiosity</b></A> : I am not familiar with all of those things, but CoolWebSearch would be the worst, with the toolbars probably next, and the tracking cookies the least problematic.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13918843</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 01:35:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13915244</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : 1.  IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br>    Ever try to kill Wintoolsa?  Nasty.<br>2.  New.net<br>    Seen it make XP boot in 125 minutes.<br>3.  CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br>    So many CWS spyware - so little time.<br>4.  SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br>    A frequent IE hijacker.<br>5.  ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br>    Sounds like a dialer.. evil concept.<br>6.  WhenU Save!<br>    No idea on its potentcy.  Very common.<br>7.  180search Assistant<br>    Same here.  Just very common.<br>8.  GAIN OfferCompanion<br>    Anything by Gator is bad.<br>9.  Hotbar<br>    If it hijacks IE, it's bad.<br>10. Download Accelerator Plus<br>    Just don't do it.<br>11. Weatherbug<br>    Glad it's being seen as spyware.<br>12. Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br>    Don't care about cookies.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13915244</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 16:34:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13914801</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/679515"><b>CalamityJane</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Grinler <A HREF="/useremail/u/981481"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br>Jane, lets post our answers anyways :)  I would love to see other hijackthis helpers opinions on this.  <br></DIV>Hi Lawrence!  Good to see you here :)<br><br>Ok...twist my arm :D<br><br>Eric wants to know how we rate them for potential risk and threat.  In addition to privacy threats (some of these collect more personally identifiable information than others - so on that alone the list would look different) but I would also have to consider changes to the system, how it installs (stealth or not), annoyance factor to the user (Aurora rates high on that alone), potential to download additional software/malware to a system and difficulty of removal.  So this is a tough question.  But CWS Homesearch assistant absolutely has to be on the top of my list as <B>pure evil</B>.  Aurora, Elitebar and Wintools/Huntbar are kind of all about the same level and mostly evil. Newdotnet as you noted is dangerous because of it's potential to damage the LSP stack in removal (causing loss of internet connectivity)- we've seen a LOT of that.  180, GAIN, & WhenU I lump those together in the next level.  Hotbar and Download Accelerator Plus further down the list.  The cookie is next to last and Weatherbug is, I think, completely innocent as the newer version doesn't have the trickler and people really enjoy and use the program.  I see that about as harmless as AIM<br><br>CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br><br>ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br><br>SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br><br>IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br><br>New.net<br><br>180search Assistant<br><br>GAIN OfferCompanion<br><br>WhenU Save<br><br>Hotbar<br><br>Download Accelerator Plus<br><br>Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br><br>Weatherbug<br><br><I>Edit to add:  CWS evil also changes security settings on a system...I could go on and on about that one! - But that alone makes it's intention malicious</I><br><SMALL>--<br>It takes a disaster to make a woman out of a female<BR><br><A HREF="http://forum.gladiator-antivirus.com">Gladiator Security Forum</A><BR><br><br>Proud Member of <A HREF="http://asap.maddoktor2.com/">ASAP </A> (Alliance of Security Analysis Professionals)</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13914801</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 15:29:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13914348</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/981481"><b>Grinler</b></A> : Jane, lets post our answers anyways :)  I would love to see other hijackthis helpers opinions on this.  <br><br>ABetterInternet (Aurora) (Major PITA)<br><br>CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant) (This, IMHO, is one of the first hijackers to have viral characteristics with its use of ADS files on legit windows files. Since then we have seen a few more)<br><br>New.net (Only higher than searchmiracle/elitebar because of the potential damage a bad uninstall can cause)<br><br>SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br><br>IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br><br>WhenU Save!<br><br>GAIN OfferCompanion<br><br>180search Assistant<br><br>Hotbar<br><br>Download Accelerator Plus<br><br>Weatherbug<br><br>Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br><br>--<br>Lawrence<br><A HREF="http://www.bleepingcomputer.com">BleepingComputer.com</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13914348</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 14:19:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13913937</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1019956"><b>PA Bear1</b></A> : Not putting a lot of thought/research on this:<br><br>ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br>CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br>180search Assistant<br>SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br>IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br>WhenU Save!<br>GAIN OfferCompanion<br>New.net<br>Hotbar<br>Download Accelerator Plus<br>Weatherbug<br>Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br><SMALL>--<br>Robear Dyer, MS MVP-Windows (IE/OE) & Security, Aumha Forums VSOP & Moderator</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13913937</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 13:11:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13913356</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/197199"><b>Doctor Four</b></A> : 1)ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br>2)CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br>3)IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br>4)180search Assistant<br>5)SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br>6)New.Net<br>7)Hotbar<br>8)WhenU Save!<br>9)GAIN OfferCompanion<br>10)Download Accelerator Plus<br>11)Weatherbug<br>12)Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br><br>The first 4 are especially bad, and IMO, Direct Revenue's<br>crap has now surpassed CoolWebSearch as being the<br>nastiest adware on the planet.<br><SMALL>--<br>"Kayura or Badamon, whichever you are, you should know that I will never give up this battle. By the will of the Ancient, I shall succeed!" - Shuten (Anubis) from the Ronin Warriors.<br>To RIAA/MPAA - You can sue but you can't catch everyone!</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13913356</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:44:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13913338</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br>SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br>IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br>ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br>180search Assistant<br>Hotbar<br>GAIN OfferCompanion<br>Download Accelerator Plus<br>New.net<br>WhenU Save!<br>Weatherbug<br>Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13913338</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:41:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13913275</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1163957"><b>Shriyash</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  DiscipleMike <A HREF="/useremail/u/752120"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR><STRONG>1. (most severe)</STRONG><br>CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br><br><STRONG>2-12 (I don't really have an order preference for these)</STRONG><br>WhenU Save!<br>Download Accelerator Plus<br>ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br>180search Assistant<br>SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br>New.net<br>IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br>GAIN OfferCompanion<br>Hotbar<br>Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br>Weatherbug<br> </DIV>Ditto :huh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13913275</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:31:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13913256</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/752120"><b>DiscipleMike</b></A> : <STRONG>1. (most severe)</STRONG><br>CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br><br><STRONG>2-12 (I don't really have an order preference for these)</STRONG><br>WhenU Save!<br>Download Accelerator Plus<br>ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br>180search Assistant<br>SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br>New.net<br>IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br>GAIN OfferCompanion<br>Hotbar<br>Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br>Weatherbug<br><SMALL>--<br>Mike... For the things which are seen are temporary, but the things which are not seen are eternal.  2 Cor. 4:18</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13913256</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:27:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13913240</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/679515"><b>CalamityJane</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  RobertLudlum <A HREF="/useremail/u/1143581"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br>I see quite a few people ranked Aurora No 1,  I wonder why.<br>Very common ?<br> </DIV>Interesting question!  I am a HijackThis expert so I can't answer Eric's survey with an unslighted opinion.  But as to your question about Aurora....I can.  It is quite common, but more than that, it is the most hated I have seen from all of the victims I have helped.  One of my first sightings of Aurora intrigued me to help the young man posting at another forum because the username he had signed up with was:  <B>IWishDeathUponDirectRevenue</B> (Direct Revenue aka abetterinternet) Now who could not resist a piqued curiosity on what single malware could cause that much hate?  (It was Aurora)<br><br><I>Edit: To clarify DirectRevnue aka abetterinternet</I><br><SMALL>--<br>It takes a disaster to make a woman out of a female<BR><br><A HREF="http://forum.gladiator-antivirus.com">Gladiator Security Forum</A><BR><br><br>Proud Member of <A HREF="http://asap.maddoktor2.com/">ASAP </A> (Alliance of Security Analysis Professionals)</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13913240</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:23:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13913080</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/305506"><b>jmorlan</b></A> : 1.  CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br>2.  ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br>3.  SearchMiracle/Elitebar *<br>4.  IBIS Websearch/Wintools *<br>5.  180search Assistant<br>6.  GAIN OfferCompanion<br>7.  Hotbar<br>8.  New.net<br>9.  WhenU Save!<br>10. Download Accelerator Plus<br>11. Weatherbug<br>12. Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br><br>* NOTE:  Items marked by a * are just guesses.  I have very little personal knowledge of those programs.  <br><br>I am comfortable with the first two as severe threats and the bottom two as relatively benign.  The rest of the pack in the middle could be rearranged, but I ranked the ones near the bottom that I thought could be most easily removed by the end user.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13913080</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 10:53:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13913021</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1143581"><b>RobertLudlum</b></A> : Like most others here who are relatively security conscious but not involved directly as  HJT log helpers, I have not kept up with the exact details of what they all do, but almost all the names are familar. The only one I haven't heard of is IBIS Websearch/Wintools.<br> <br>As such my impressions is exactly the same as "Your Kung-fu is Not strong". Eg 1. CWS 11. Webbug 12. Tracking cookies 2-10 All others (are they all toolbars except for Newnet?).<br><br>I see quite a few people ranked Aurora No 1,  I wonder why.<br>Very common ?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13913021</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 10:39:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13913001</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/575771"><b>mens rea</b></A> : CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br>New.net<br>ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br>IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br>180search Assistant<br>Hotbar<br>SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br>WhenU Save!<br>GAIN OfferCompanion<br>Download Accelerator Plus<br>Weatherbug<br>Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br><br>New.net and CoolWebSearch, at least in my limited experience in delousing family and friends computers, (outside of the doubleclick cookie) have been the most prevalent.  Depending on which version of New.net inflicts itself upon the user ie whether it appears in the add/remove programs list or not, seems to be reflective of the difficulty of removal. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13913001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 10:36:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13912964</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/467921"><b>MapleLeaf</b></A> : <B>1-2. (Pure Evil)</B><br>ABetterInternet (Aurora) and CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br><B>3.</B><br>IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br><B>4.</B><br>180search Assistant and WhenU Save!<br><B>5-10.</B><br>The rest, except for 11 and 12:<br>Weatherbug and Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br><SMALL>--<br>Remember, I'm pulling for you - we are all in this together...</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13912964</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 10:30:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13912884</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/624532"><b>mem357</b></A> : I think CoolWebSearch is the worst, most insidious<br>spyware pest of all. I confess I don't know much about<br>ABetterInternet or most of the others, but I don't think<br>they could match CWS for total spyware maliciousness. <br>Sorry I couldn't be more helpful, Eric, and thanks for<br>all you do in the fight against these costly pests. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13912884</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 10:13:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13912870</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/869928"><b>winxp_fin</b></A> : 1.<B>ABetterInternet (Aurora)</B><br>2.CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br>3.IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br>4.SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br>5.180search Assistant<br>6.WhenU Save!<br>7.New.net<br>8.GAIN OfferCompanion<br>9.Hotbar<br>10.Weatherbug<br>11.Download Accelerator Plus<br>12.Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br><br>:uhh: :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13912870</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 10:10:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13912707</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1162456"><b>fatdcuk</b></A> : 1)ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br>2)CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br>3)IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br>4)New.net<br>5)SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br>6)180search Assistant<br>7)WhenU Save!<br>8)Hotbar<br>9)GAIN OfferCompanion<br>10)Download Accelerator Plus<br>11)Weatherbug<br>12)Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br><br>HTH:)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13912707</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 09:31:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13912684</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/659356"><b>ctrip</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  eburger68 <A HREF="/useremail/u/378696"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><br><br> I'm curious as to how you, the users of such anti-spyware prorgrams, perceive the potential risks or threat potentials inherent in these detections.<br> </DIV>Being fairly uninformed about spyware, I never heard of many of the items in your list. I purposely made no effort to learn about any of them prior to making my list. So what you are going to get from me is a list of my (typical oblivious computer user) impressions. I don't think it will be very useful to you but figured I'd throw my 2 cents in just in case you were looking for the general population's impressions, rather than any real information.<br><br><B>1. (most severe)</B><br>CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br><br><B>2-11 (don't really know)</B><br>WhenU Save!<br>Download Accelerator Plus<br>ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br>180search Assistant<br>SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br>New.net<br>IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br>GAIN OfferCompanion<br>Hotbar<br><br><B>12. (least severe)</B><br>Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br>Weatherbug<br><br>I placed CoolWebSearch in the most severe category because I seem to remember that there was a specialized piece of software needed it to remove it from computers because a lot of regular anti-crapware software couldn't remove it. This could be wrong but its what I think I remember.<br><br>The majority, I placed in my I don't know category (in no particular order) because I have either heard of them (like New.net, Hotbar, and WhenU Save!) and couldn't remember if they were truly bad or were like the things getting downgraded in MSAS and maybe not really so bad. Or I hadn't heard of them at all.<br><br>I put Weatherbug in my least severe category because I used it in the past and while it had advertisements...I remember knowing that going in and figured that was the trade off in using the free piece of software. In other words, it was my own choice to install it, knowing about the ads ahead of time. <br><br>Finally, I always delete tracking cookies when they show up in my Ad-Aware scans but never really thought that they were harmful.<br> <br><SMALL>--<br>Spread Internet Explorer! - The browser you can trust to not have those annoying Firefox twits pushing it!</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13912684</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 09:23:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13912672</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1234295"><b>Biscuit_AB</b></A> : ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br>CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br>IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br>180search Assistant<br>Hotbar<br>SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br>New.net<br>WhenU Save!<br>GAIN OfferCompanion<br>Download Accelerator Plus<br>Weatherbug<br>Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br><br>Just a couple of changes from Merlyn's list. I think one thing that is extremely important in considering risk of various spyware/adware pieces is the relative prevalence of the installers out in the wild. In which case, seems anything by DR is top-of-the-list.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13912672</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 09:20:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13912458</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/855835"><b>CajunTek</b></A> : ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br>IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br>CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br>180search Assistant<br>SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br>New.net<br>Hotbar<br>WhenU Save!<br>GAIN OfferCompanion<br>Download Accelerator Plus<br>Weatherbug<br>Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br><br>Note Eric:<br>These<B><br>CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br>180search Assistant<br>SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br>New.net<br>Hotbar</B><br><br>Could go in just about any order IMHO..  They are all crap and all have some difficulty to remove..<br><SMALL>--<br>Lost in Texas</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13912458</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 08:04:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Informal Adware Risk Survey</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13912417</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/378696"><b>eburger68</b></A> : Hi All:<br><br>I've put together a list of 12 items that are typically detected by many anti-spyware programs. I'm curious as to how you, the users of such anti-spyware programs, perceive the potential risks or threat potentials inherent in these detections.<br><br>WhenU Save!<br>Download Accelerator Plus<br>ABetterInternet (Aurora)<br>Weatherbug<br>180search Assistant<br>SearchMiracle/Elitebar<br>Tracking cookie (Doubleclick)<br>New.net<br>CoolWebSearch (HomeSearchAssistant)<br>IBIS Websearch/Wintools<br>GAIN OfferCompanion<br>Hotbar<br><br>What I'd like those interested to do is respond to this post. In your response rank the above 12 programs in terms of the severity of the threat to users' privacy and security, with 1 being the most severe and 12 being the least severe, thusly:<br><br>1. Program 1 (most severe)<br>2.<br>(...)<br>11.<br>12. Program 12 (least severe)<br><br>I encourage you to copy the list of items from this post (above) and sort/rank them as you deem appropriate. Also, you're welcome to consult online sources, if you wish (this is not a quiz or exam of any sort). Finally, feel free to add notes or explanations to justify your rankings.<br><br>Please note that the original list (above) is sorted in no particular order. <br><br>In case you're wondering, I'm conducting this informal survey more for my own edification -- to learn how real users actually perceive the potential risks of a range of threat detections.<br><br>Best,<br><br>Eric L. Howes]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13912417</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 07:46:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
