<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;A utility - but not a right&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/A-utility-but-not-a-right-13950105</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:31:20 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:31:20 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>A utility - but not a right</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/A-utility-but-not-a-right-13950105</link>
<description><![CDATA[Linklist posted : Broadband should be seen as a utility like phone service or water service or sewer service. But that doesn't make it a right. Many areas of the country have neither water service or sewer service. Those people have to dig wells for water and cesspools for waste output. <br><br>To call it a right just plays into the hands of the welfare state advocates who will want the taxpayer to subsidize every welfare household with broadband access. Nix on that.<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/4zmr3"><B>My Web Page</B></A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/5eurx"><B>Join Red Room Forum</B></A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/A-utility-but-not-a-right-13950105</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:51:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
