<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Giant Jap satellite must still obey law of phy in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r14093707</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:22:24 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:22:24 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Giant Jap satellite must still obey law of phy</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14093707</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1227273"><b>fuziwuzi</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  TKJunkMail <A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR>One thing that the news item left out of this wonderful product is that the average latency of about 800 msecs for a satellite connection( &raquo;<A HREF="/faq/satellite">Satellite Forum FAQ</A> &raquo;<A HREF="/faq/2001">What are the average ping times for satellite?</A> ) makes the product a poor supplier of interactive internet browsing. It will suffer the same problems that the Direcway( &raquo;<A HREF="/forum/sat">HughesNet Satellite</A> ) system does. <br><br>That doesn't mean it doesn't have a lot of uses. It just means that when the marketing types start hyping the product they conveniently overlook its limitations. And in comparing it to fiber optic without mentioning latency issues, they are doing just that.<br> </DIV>You're assuming a geosynchronous orbit, however.  If it were in a LEO (Low Earth Orbit), the latency could be far less.  Even with geosynchronous, the latency only becomes a problem when using something like VoIP or gaming... for standard web browsing and email, it is not an issue.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14093707</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 11:21:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Giant Jap satellite must still obey law of physics</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14092726</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.telecomasia.net/telecomasia/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=174205" >www.telecomasia.net/telecomasia/&middot;&middot;&middot;d=174205</A><br><div class="bquote">Japanese government officials said they will develop a new communications satellite to provide broadband services that are as fast as fiber-optic cable.<br><br>Japan's Internal Affairs and Communications Ministry said the new satellite will make it possible to send and receive data at a maximum speed of 100 MBps in mountainous areas and remote islands, as well as aboard Shinkansen bullet trains, airplanes and ships.<br><br>The satellite will have a dish antenna measuring 66 feet in diameter. It will be four times larger in diameter and 16 times larger in surface area than a conventional satellite antenna.</DIV>One thing that the news item left out of this wonderful product is that the average latency of about 800 msecs for a satellite connection( &raquo;<A HREF="/faq/satellite">Satellite Forum FAQ</A> &raquo;<A HREF="/faq/2001">What are the average ping times for satellite?</A> ) makes the product a poor supplier of interactive internet browsing. It will suffer the same problems that the Direcway( &raquo;<A HREF="/forum/sat">HughesNet Satellite</A> ) system does. <br><br>That doesn't mean it doesn't have a lot of uses. It just means that when the marketing types start hyping the product they conveniently overlook its limitations. And in comparing it to fiber optic without mentioning latency issues, they are doing just that.<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/a9o7w"><B>My Web Page</B></A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/5eurx"><B>Join Red Room Forum</B></A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14092726</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 08:09:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
