<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Karl, it&#x27;s you with the misinformation in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r14170701</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:37:04 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:37:04 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Karl, it&#x27;s you with the misinformation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14173195</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/141383"><b>Karl Bode</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>PA doesn't ban any municipal broadband. PA has a ROFR for municipal broadband that has fees.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>Your bosses in Harrisburg have pandered to Verizon and installed them as the gatekeeper in a process they have no business being a part of.<br> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>Once the municipality wants to use taxpayer dollars to compete against private business for a market share, it must give the ILEC a ROFR.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>Semantics again.  Any muni who wants to charge for their service (even if just to cover network costs) has to beg Verizon's permission.  Verizon then says <I>"No, we may install service there,"</I> and delays the process indefinitely by dicking about in the legal system, showing just enough skin to keep regulators off their tail.<br><br>In the meantime the town that wanted to provide service, can't.<br><br>It's a ban.  It's just more cleverly constructed to avoid backlash.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14173195</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 16:33:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Karl, it&#x27;s you with the misinformation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14172361</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/602635"><b>senatedon</b></A> : Dude:<br>you are misinformed.<br>Read the law.  PA doesn't ban any municipal broadband.  PA has a ROFR for municipal broadband that has fees.<br><br>If Smallville or SanFran wants to give away service to its residents, it can, and is not prohibited.<br><br>Once the municipality wants to use taxpayer dollars to compete against private business for a market share, it must give the ILEC a ROFR.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14172361</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:54:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Karl, it&#x27;s you with the misinformation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14172057</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1206900"><b>fiberguy</b></A> : G, <br><br>where do you keep coming up with this notion that Verizon didn't pay for the lines and that the users did? Users, last time I checked, bought phone service, not stock.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14172057</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:13:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Karl, it&#x27;s you with the misinformation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14171650</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/793283"><b>calvoiper</b></A> : Amen.<br><br>ROFR not a ban?  ROFL!<br><br>calvoiper]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14171650</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:24:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Karl, it&#x27;s you with the misinformation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14170701</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/489959"><b>nasadude</b></A> : regardless of what the actual bill says or mandates, Karl has the absolutely correct <I>interpretation</I> of the intent, so don't give him no sh1t.<br><br>Pretend what you have to pretend to make yourself feel better, but don't try convince people on this forum that Pennsylvania didn't ban municipal broadband.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14170701</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:23:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Karl, it&#x27;s you with the misinformation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14170601</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/182856"><b>cao1964</b></A> : Hey I live in PENN, and you can call it what ever, you want, in the end its the same.<br><br>They have lobbied her to stop any kind of FIOS so why not wireless also.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14170601</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:07:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Karl, it&#x27;s you with the misinformation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14170598</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/934295"><b>G_Poobah</b></A> : right of first refusal? Why the hell does verizon have that right in the first place? So, Philly got the 'exception', but every-other-place in PA got hosed.<br><br>What does this mean for other Pennsylvania towns? Well, they're pretty much screwed. They are required to give the local telcos the right of first refusal for municipal high-speed Internet services. Companies that refuse to let the cities go forward with their own internet services are required to provide a similar service within a 14 month window.<br><br>Verizon can go to hell before they have ANY rights to stop any competitor, be it city/state/private/public. Guess what verizon, you didn't pay for the telephone lines, the users of the telephone paid for it, but GUARANTEEING you a profit during your Ma Bell years. Now Verizon is just looking to screw everyone, and prevent any competition.<br><br>Though personally, I think that having any government agency run anything is a pretty bad idea, it's better than letting verizon steamroll their monopoly engine.<br><SMALL>--<br>Grand Poobah</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14170598</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:07:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Karl, it&#x27;s you with the misinformation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14170432</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/141383"><b>Karl Bode</b></A> : Semantics to make you and your bosses in Harrisburg feel better for selling out to corporate interests.  Any muni in PA now has to go to Verizon for approval.<br><br>Philly was allowed through because it quickly became a Verizon PR nightmare.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14170432</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:44:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Karl, it&#x27;s you with the misinformation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14170388</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/602635"><b>senatedon</b></A> : Again...and again, Pennsylvania did <I>NOT</I> ban municipal broadband.  Pennsylvania now has in place a right of first refusal (ROFR) plan.<br><br>The ROFR works - Philly is an example.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14170388</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:37:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
