Unofficial third party XP Service Pack in Security http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r14272401 en Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:06:20 EDT Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:06:20 EDT Re: Windows XP Service Pack 3 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14286467 foxsteve : In my previous post I add other URL for downloading SP3 as zip file and MD5 for checking it against other sources. Is it the same? Thank you.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14286467 Sat, 03 Sep 2005 14:37:09 EDT Re: Windows XP Service Pack 3 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14280631 weirdalex : I installed this pack 2 days ago and have yet to have a problem. Am I supposed to? hehe]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14280631 Fri, 02 Sep 2005 17:25:54 EDT Re: Windows XP Service Pack 3 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14279008 foxsteve : You can download the separated patches from the full list of software in Service Pack 3 from www.thehotfix.net/sp3.html

BTW, according to thehotfix notice
All hotfix downloads are linked directly to Microsoft. These are 100% official downloads.
Added.
I have checked downloading speed from this URL - request a few hours.
Therefore I propose other URL »majorgeeks.com/Windows_XP_Servic···754.html - I downloaded that Pack during 9 min.

Name: WXPENUX_SP3.ZIP
Size: 105766909 bytes
CRC-32: CC0B4BF7
MD5: F96C0B9C50AD71FBF68413E2AAC87F1E
Contains: 126 files (35 packed)
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14279008 Fri, 02 Sep 2005 13:37:03 EDT Re: Windows XP Service Pack 3 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14277060 novaflare :
said by XBL2009 See Profile :

said by Owlbet See Profile :

Why anyone would even consider downloading Windows patches from anywhere other than Microsoft© or Windows Update is beyond me. But there are those gullible enough to do it.
These are from microsoft, they are just mainly for companies that have specific bugs that microsoft tries to crunch out a quick patch.
I aggreee with owlbet here. While the patches might be from ms you simply can not know what else is in there with them. Maybe this one is 100% legit with out any trojans keylogger cd key steelers etc. But i remember one for windows 98 way back when that was packed with a full blown trojan a keylogger, a pre configured proxy and a irc ddos bot.

When it comes to patches and driver related tyhings do not use 3rd party releases or apps. Driver removers totaly suck i mean realy if ati and nvidia cant get it right do you realy thing guru3d can?
--
DSLR security chat at us.ausirc.net chanel #dslr_sec lets pack this channel open source dns server for *nix and windows »powerdns.com]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14277060 Fri, 02 Sep 2005 08:47:54 EDT Re: Windows XP Service Pack 3 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14277047 novaflare :
said by BlitzenZeus See Profile :

In my case I wouldn't be effected to badly, while I don't use system restore which is actually quite worthless against real problems, I make semi-frequent images of my operating system partition while keeping additional information/applications on other partitions. So if an uninstall doesn't work I can always go back.

I've only encountered two bad updates, one messed up my desktop, and icons on Win98se, it was a local exploit so it would have to be on my system to effect me so I was not worried, and another on XP, when Microsoft first released bluetooth drivers for XP they were actually the beta drivers being developed in XP SP2, so Microsoft was giving beta drivers out with their bluetooth hardware people actually paid for. When SP2 came out I did a clean install with a slipstreamed SP2, and the new drivers were much better. The real issue was they didn't let you know they were beta drivers, but I also became part of the XP SP2 beta testing so I figured it out real quick...
Lol sounds like a ooopsy to me. Ati shipped out their radeon 9200 with beta 4.1 cat drivers lol. Nvidia did the same with i thing the 5500 t one point forget the brand of the nvidia card now. I just know this sort of beta driver v real driver happens now and then compleatly by accident. I know it was a accident with ati for sure because the beta they shipped for that shipment included a beta tester only utility for drivers :)
--
DSLR security chat at us.ausirc.net chanel #dslr_sec lets pack this channel open source dns server for *nix and windows »powerdns.com]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14277047 Fri, 02 Sep 2005 08:43:20 EDT Re: Windows XP Service Pack 3 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14275661 Owlbet :
said by XBL2009 See Profile :

These are from microsoft, they are just mainly for companies that have specific bugs that microsoft tries to crunch out a quick patch.
Specific bugs or not, I would NEVER download any Windows patch or Service Pack from a third party site. I've seen too many HJT logs posted in this very forum and I know full well what you download is not always what you install. JMO]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14275661 Fri, 02 Sep 2005 00:41:35 EDT Re: Windows XP Service Pack 3 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14275602 XBL2009 :
said by Owlbet See Profile :

Why anyone would even consider downloading Windows patches from anywhere other than Microsoft© or Windows Update is beyond me. But there are those gullible enough to do it.
These are from microsoft, they are just mainly for companies that have specific bugs that microsoft tries to crunch out a quick patch. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14275602 Fri, 02 Sep 2005 00:33:11 EDT Re: Windows XP Service Pack 3 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14274761 Owlbet : Why anyone would even consider downloading Windows patches from anywhere other than Microsoft© or Windows Update is beyond me. But there are those gullible enough to do it.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14274761 Thu, 01 Sep 2005 22:39:05 EDT Re: Windows XP Service Pack 3 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14274642 BlitzenZeus : In my case I wouldn't be effected to badly, while I don't use system restore which is actually quite worthless against real problems, I make semi-frequent images of my operating system partition while keeping additional information/applications on other partitions. So if an uninstall doesn't work I can always go back.

I've only encountered two bad updates, one messed up my desktop, and icons on Win98se, it was a local exploit so it would have to be on my system to effect me so I was not worried, and another on XP, when Microsoft first released bluetooth drivers for XP they were actually the beta drivers being developed in XP SP2, so Microsoft was giving beta drivers out with their bluetooth hardware people actually paid for. When SP2 came out I did a clean install with a slipstreamed SP2, and the new drivers were much better. The real issue was they didn't let you know they were beta drivers, but I also became part of the XP SP2 beta testing so I figured it out real quick...
--
My hourly rates:
$25 per hour.
$35 per hour if you want to watch.
$45 per hour if you want to help.
$75 per hour if you tried to fix it, and failed.
The biggest error is sitting in front of your keyboard.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14274642 Thu, 01 Sep 2005 22:25:19 EDT Re: Windows XP Service Pack 3 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14274518 novaflare :
said by BlitzenZeus See Profile :

Most people who have installed a update, or patch have encountered at least one bad one, some of these are beta, do you really want to install a beta patch??
Strangly never on my own system. Probably because i never update a old os install and instead opt for a reformat then start piling on the updates. I realy started doing this in case the worst did happen and the os went belly up id not have much to loose. Seems that most isues with updates happen on old beat up installs.

I fully agree dont fool around with betas less your ready to acept the risk invulved. If your willing and able i say go for it. The update might just give you exactly what your after. But if your not willing to loose data or have your os go belly up and be totaly unrecoverable other than a full reformat then stay away.
--
DSLR security chat at us.ausirc.net chanel #dslr_sec lets pack this channel open source dns server for *nix and windows »powerdns.com]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14274518 Thu, 01 Sep 2005 22:10:41 EDT Re: Windows XP Service Pack 3 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14272947 dp :
said by foxsteve See Profile :

Thank you. Will wait.
Good choice ;)
--
Write your questions down on the back of a $20 dollar bill and send them to me]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14272947 Thu, 01 Sep 2005 18:38:45 EDT Re: Windows XP Service Pack 3 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14272717 foxsteve : Thank you. Will wait.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14272717 Thu, 01 Sep 2005 18:10:06 EDT Re: Windows XP Service Pack 3 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14272459 BlitzenZeus : Most people who have installed a update, or patch have encountered at least one bad one, some of these are beta, do you really want to install a beta patch??]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14272459 Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:31:59 EDT Re: Windows XP Service Pack 3 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14272441 XBL2009 : It's a 100+ hotfix pack of many of the Windows XP SP3 fixes up for download.

These are fixes that you would have to call Microsoft and get through their support center.

Means you can't get them from Windows Update because they are not yet official patches. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14272441 Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:29:04 EDT Unofficial third party XP Service Pack http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14272401 foxsteve : What is Windows XP Service Pack 3 Preview, which was designed by thehotfix.net?
I looked it on »www.softpedia.com.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14272401 Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:23:46 EDT