<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update in Security Product Vendors</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r14357811</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:32:50 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:32:50 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14388746</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/627054"><b>boblandy</b></A> : well at least the three of us have it figured out<br>now we'll just have to wait for zonelabs to get the picture<br><SMALL>--<br>look out kid they keep it all hid</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14388746</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2005 03:27:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14388743</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/253424"><b>WLiley</b></A> : Yep, agree.<br>And add to that, the fact that forcing an update check will increment the timestamp of AV definitions (even when there is nothing new) while not incrementing the AS timestamp - tells me that they have work to do for both.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14388743</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2005 03:26:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14388671</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/627054"><b>boblandy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  TK421 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1127059"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>But I think I just found the answer!</DIV>i think you did too.  we'll watch for it to change with the next release.  thanks<br><SMALL>--<br>look out kid they keep it all hid</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14388671</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2005 02:46:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14388083</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1127059"><b>TK421</b></A> : <B>Anti-spyware signature DAT file version:01.200509.131</B><br><br>And BTW, looking at the signature file version it appears to indicate the release date 2005, 09, 13 ???<br><br>I checked the date on my own C:\Windows\System32\ZoneAlarm\spyware.dat file and it is 9/09... don't know how I got it four days early if that really is the numbering scheme.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14388083</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2005 00:17:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14387945</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1127059"><b>TK421</b></A> : Hmmn. Maybe you're right.<br><br>But I think I just found the answer! Definition updates <I>should</I> show the version (not just the date) within the control panel but there <B>IS</B> a unique number assigned.<br><br>Right-Click the ZA systray icon, then select "About..."<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=2 WIDTH=66%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/14387945?c=892819&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxNDM1NzgxMS54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="20294 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=369 HEIGHT=346 SRC="/r0/download/892819~0071d461052dbc803a3ee58aacc69872/ZAPabout.jpg"></A><br>DEF VERSION #</TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14387945</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 23:51:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14387740</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/627054"><b>boblandy</b></A> : rather than your idea that ZA releases new defs on friday, i see a pattern developing of tuesday<I>-ish</I> releases...<br><br><A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14102991">8/10</A> ... wednesday<br><A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14200650">8/23</A> ... tuesday<br><A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14309534">9/6</A> ... tuesday<br><A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14357811">9/13</A> ... tuesday<br><SMALL>--<br>look out kid they keep it all hid</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14387740</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 23:15:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14387688</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/627054"><b>boblandy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  WLiley <A HREF="/useremail/u/253424"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>So I uninstalled & reinstalled.  Rebooted and got the AS update</DIV>but what did this tell you, really, about the date of the def update?<br><br>undoubtedly they show on your machine as the date they were downloaded, and this does nothing to resolve the original question that was brought up here....<br><br>did i really find new 9/13 defs or was i 4 days late on ones dated 9/9<br><br>and until ZA elects to assign a version number to their updates, this same uncertainty will prevail<br><br>don't you agree<br><SMALL>--<br>look out kid they keep it all hid</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14387688</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 23:03:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14387647</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1127059"><b>TK421</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  boblandy <A HREF="/useremail/u/627054"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  TK421 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1127059"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>If the regular Friday update remains predictable</DIV>did you get an update<br> </DIV>Nope nothing... so much for that. :huh::uhh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14387647</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 22:55:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14387615</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/253424"><b>WLiley</b></A> : Version 6.0.667.000<br><br>Auto update enabled.<br><br>Have noticed that if I force an update check, <br>the AV reports that specific date/time of said check.<br>The AS reports back a date/time of actual signature update.<br><br>Seems a bit odd.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14387615</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 22:49:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14387574</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/627054"><b>boblandy</b></A> : glad to see you post back<br><br>mind sharing with us what version you run<br><br>and<br><br>do you have auto updating enabled<br><br>btw, i immediately saw the similarity between the zonelabs "cure" and what symantec recommends... and would have smiled at same were it not so frustrating<br><SMALL>--<br>look out kid they keep it all hid</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14387574</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 22:41:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14387550</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/253424"><b>WLiley</b></A> : I wanted to chime in again.<br>My wife's pc recieved the update just as Bob reported, and WHEN reported.  Yet no matter what I tried (and there seems to be little to try) - I could not get the update.<br><br>So, I created a case w/ Zone Labs - just as the ZL User Forum suggests.  What I got back from them was the most disappointing email yet.  It did not even acknowledge that specific problem.  Instead it only gave detailed instructions on how to uninstall & reinstall.  Sort of a "no matter what your problem is, do this..."<br>(Which I can do with my eyes closed.)<br><br>It did not even say that "this will work" though I knew it would.  So I uninstalled & reinstalled.  Rebooted and got the AS update.<br><br>I can't remember for sure, but way way back when I used Norton I think that was "the solution" to not getting their updates too.  That was one of many reasons I dumped them when I did.<br><br>Having had many inside contacts w/ ZL & Checkpoint over the years, I can tell ya that there's alot of changes going on there.  Not all appear to be good changes.<br><SMALL>--<br><I><B><A HREF="http://www.zonelabs.com/contact/teamz.html">Team Z  Member</A></B><I>"The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over."</I> <B>Hunter S. Thompson </B></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14387550</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 22:36:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14383758</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/627054"><b>boblandy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  TK421 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1127059"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>If the regular Friday update remains predictable</DIV>did you get an update<br><SMALL>--<br>look out kid they keep it all hid</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14383758</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:24:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14359972</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1127059"><b>TK421</b></A> : Of course. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14359972</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 03:28:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14359967</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/627054"><b>boblandy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  TK421 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1127059"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>but don't try to convince me ZAP is inferior in any way to many of the programs that are allowed</DIV>you're speaking in general, to others, i suspect<br><br>because i'm not trying to convince you of that<br><SMALL>--<br>look out kid they keep it all hid</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14359967</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 03:25:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14359958</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1127059"><b>TK421</b></A> : Well none of the other security suites get in either... but don't try to convince me ZAP is inferior in any way to many of the programs that are allowed. Personally, I believe ZAP antispyware is at the very least as good (better) than MSAS (although I use both).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14359958</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 03:22:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14359945</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/627054"><b>boblandy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  TK421 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1127059"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Wouldn't it be nice if ZA was included in the Security Updates sticky? I doubt that will happen though</DIV>i was already told not to post these updates there, and not even in the security forum... and not to expect to see them in the updates forum <I>"for a long while"</I> because it's <I>"not a software most people can or do rely on"</I><br><SMALL>--<br>look out kid they keep it all hid</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14359945</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 03:15:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14359919</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1127059"><b>TK421</b></A> : I completely agree - ZoneLabs should add a definition number to make it clear what version is current. Perhaps they want to encourage users to enable auto-update?<br><br>The problem is they are using only the date to show definitions version while most other AV/AS programs have version numbers. That can cause confusion posting about updates for those, like me, who prefer to update manually. Wouldn't it be nice if ZA was included in the Security Updates sticky? I doubt that will happen though. :huh:<br><br>This is my only gripe with ZA AntiSpyware since it really does seem to be very good protection. If the regular Friday update remains predictable at least I'll know when to expect it (also Thursday update for MSAS-Beta).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14359919</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 03:04:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14359731</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/627054"><b>boblandy</b></A> : without some means of identifying the updates other than the date (which appears on each user's system as the time they are downloaded), this type of uncertainty will always occur<br><br>if ZA is going to insist on this oddball method of assigning ever-changing dates to each new def release, then at least they could issue a version number to go with the update, like Microsoft AntiSpyware Beta1 does, to distinguish one update from another<br><SMALL>--<br>look out kid they keep it all hid</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14359731</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 01:46:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14359615</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1127059"><b>TK421</b></A> : You always beat me to it Bob. ;)<br><br>I get most security (and other) updates after reading about them first at BBR.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14359615</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 01:17:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14359448</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/627054"><b>boblandy</b></A> : again, quite possible i just today grabbed defs from 9/9, and they appear to me as 9/13<br><br>why don't you guys consider posting them when you get them<br><br>that's what i've been trying to do<br><SMALL>--<br>look out kid they keep it all hid</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14359448</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 00:44:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14359149</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1127059"><b>TK421</b></A> : Strange. I have 6.0.667.000 but received no update tonight. The pattern thus far was new weekly definitions each Friday...<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/14359149?c=890885&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxNDM1NzgxMS54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="18521 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=406 HEIGHT=454 SRC="/r0/download/890885~e19195a8e6329ae54d50b32e465c3bb9/zapupdate.jpg"></A><br>Checking for Update</TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14359149</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:56:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14358917</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/627054"><b>boblandy</b></A> : yet another variable to consider here is that many ZAP users are experiencing problems getting updates... to the point that the newest version release 6.0.667.000 includes, among other improvements, <br><br><I>Fixed - Anti-Spyware update sometimes "not responding"</I><br><br>out of curiosity, what version are you running <br><SMALL>--<br>look out kid they keep it all hid</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14358917</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:21:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14358859</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/627054"><b>boblandy</b></A> : thing is, to the best of my knowledge, ZA Anti-spyware defs are dated according to when they are downloaded by the user, not according to when they are released<br><br>Microsoft AntiSpyware Beta1 does the same thing with their defs, but at least they assign a version number to keep it more identifiable<br><br>i posted the defs as soon as i saw them.  if they were around since 9/9, who knows<br><br>or maybe you downloaded the <A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14309534">9/6/2005</A> defs three days after they became available<br><br>i think they could use a better system<br><SMALL>--<br>look out kid they keep it all hid</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14358859</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:15:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14358844</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/253424"><b>WLiley</b></A> : Okay,  now how to explain why I'm not getting the update?<br>Have checked for update several times today.  Twice since your post.<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/14358844?c=890865&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxNDM1NzgxMS54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="36877 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=559 HEIGHT=570 SRC="/r0/download/890865~d37b7f0f3102e2c373fea33ba861ec45/ZASS.PNG"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14358844</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:13:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14358810</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/627054"><b>boblandy</b></A> : as stated, Anti-spyware update...<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/14358810?c=890864&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxNDM1NzgxMS54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="11572 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=404 HEIGHT=175 SRC="/r0/download/890864~f0c090574a29f5de2546cbb180a4e143/MSASdefs.jpg"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14358810</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:08:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14358767</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/253424"><b>WLiley</b></A> : Anti-spyware?  or anti-virus?<br><br>Mine shows AV definitions of 9/13.<br>But AS definitions of 9/9]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14358767</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:02:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ZoneAlarm Anti-spyware update</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14357811</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/627054"><b>boblandy</b></A> : definitions dated 9/13/2005]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14357811</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:03:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
