http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r14374 en Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:29:09 EDT Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:29:09 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15426 Karl Bode : No no, you misread. Some people can get 20-30ms with RADSL. Covad RADSL lines see a minimum of 65ms. I usually get 75ms standard.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15426 Fri, 09 Jun 2000 12:33:31 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14765 Jerm : Complaining about 20ms? Hello, THATS LOW!

I'm stuck with crappy GTE interleave values that cause me 25ms minimum latency!

I had ADSL, and it was more, RADSL lowered it!

Its the stupid Orckit modems :P

BTW I see the lowest in game pings of around 50ms, but most servers are min 80ms]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14765 Mon, 05 Jun 2000 02:57:11 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14453 Karl Bode : Supposedly other providers RADSL doesn't suffer the same hit and can obtain pings of 20-30ms. What is Covad doing that is making this RADSL, for lack of a better term, suck?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14453 Fri, 02 Jun 2000 09:38:46 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14374 anon : 123 packets transmitted, 123 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 51.103/58.268/67.066/4.894 ms

on my covad adsl 1.5/384 line]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14374 Thu, 01 Jun 2000 16:40:45 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14347 Karl Bode : Yes sir. This is something I was complaining about a month ago when I got my Covad 608 RADSL service. Everyone called me MAD! MAD! Ye said something must be wrong with my PC! Heathen.

With this Covad RADSL setup, I have yet to see a ping under 65 under PRISTINE conditions.

I be thinkin they might wanna be changing their ways.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14347 Thu, 01 Jun 2000 12:08:58 EDT