thumbs down from:
mrchris 
| Good to see these IRRESPONSIBLE MOMS being... ...PROSECUTED for failing to monitor the activities of their children. Abdicating your parental duties to a TV or PC is criminal and these folks SHOULD be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Good to see the RIAA enforcing copyright law uniformly on ALL Pirates. Don't make no diff if you're a Mon, a hooker, a pimple faced kid, or a CEO - PIRACY is still a crime that you should be punished for.
Does this dumb B*TCH think that a small HD and questionable CD drive means no crime was committed??? What an A*S WIPE she must be ! |
|
 mrchrisOut and aroundPremium
join:2002-10-01
North Babylon, NY | Say something else, will you, RIAA drone  |
|
| reply to betURazzzBUBBA
Wow Taylor. A little more c*rsing in your rant this time. No prison references either. Do we have a copycat Taylor? |
|
Primis1
join:2005-06-13
Coldwater, MI | reply to betURazzzBUBBA
That would take the world's smartest 7 year-old, to be finding and downloading music off the internet.
I have an 8 year-old nephew who is *really* sharp and intelligent, and pretty tech-savvy, and even he wouldn't yet have the ability to figure out how to find the latest Nelly track and download it over P2P. And then to have the patience to actually wait for it and get it (you have any idea how patient 7 year-olds are? They aren't, and that's the point).
No, if it's just her and her 7 year-old, and she can prove she didn't do anything, I'd love to see the prosecution attempt to prove it was the 7 year-old then, serving MP3's. Kids are tech-savvy, but not THAT tech-savvy at that age, and definitely not patient enough to be finding music, downloading it into a library, and then serving it. |
|
 kangabilDo It Now, Do It RightPremium
join:2005-05-15
Australia | reply to betURazzzBUBBA
HELLOOOOO
Be quiet, be vewy vewy quiet
I’m NOT hunting wascally wabbits
In fact I’m hunting A RABBIT, a special rabbit
Oh Taylor where are yoooooo????
Ahah!!, there you are!!
Your technique is a shocker.
Anyone can throw a couple of sticks of dynamite overboard and catch something. But it’s a poor catch and not really edible.
A REAL fisherman uses minimal rig and lands the big ones. Finesse son, finesse. Tease and gently get the big bite. I notice that you’re not getting the big bites anymore; the thinkers are now gun shy aren’t they.
Where’s Cudni’s cutting retort? Lil Huricane’s lash? Retire_Rich’s repost? Can’t be very satisfying only catching tiddlers??
But having analysed your attempts at profundity it becomes very obvious that quality is not your style eh?
Smarten up my lad and let’s see some attempt at originality. You’re too well known now to make any of the impact you’d so dearly like to make.
Exhibitionism is for wierdos in trench coats in dark parks, still that seems to be your style so far.
Go away and learn a new tack; then I’ll talk to you again.
--
Who was that masked man? |
|
 Doctor FourMy other vehicle is a TARDISPremium
join:2000-09-05
Dallas, TX | reply to Primis1
I'll bet he didn't even read the p2pnet.net article,
»p2pnet.net/story/6283
especially the part about FACT vs. FICTION. |
|
| reply to kangabil
Heh, there will always be dynamite fishermen. Got it right on the impact thing though. Nobody takes him seriously at all. Once you see "taylor01.mi.comcast" all you have to do is just scroll down past his drivel and read the funnies 
--
Mikami Vvian, resident Girlfriend of Steel, care of the Tokyo-3 Middle Daughters Club |
|
kangabilDo It Now, Do It RightPremium
join:2005-05-15
Australia |  Oh I never totally ignore anyone. Not polite.;)
Besides I need a new hobby. This might just be it.
If you see our mate around the forums give me a heads up and I'll take a look. Unfortunately I can't be everywhere at once.
--
Who was that masked man? |
|
|
|
