2 edits | reply to IOddity
Re: Who hates Skype? Well, that makes a WHOLE lot of sense, because it will only force the VoIP clients to add extra "garbage" traffic to confuse the filters. In other words, as I understand it a Skype client now tries to send just the audio data alone, but if it has to I'm sure it could be modified to grab some random data from the user's browser cache.
I mean, here's a thought: Both clients (the one on each end) grabs a random web page that is accessible to both. They then use the content of that page as a seed to encrypt the data. How are the filters going to know what kind of traffic it is? Meanwhile both sides are uploading and downloading even more bytes just to confuse the filters. Also, the CEO of this company may be saying that commercial VoIP shouldn't be blocked now, but you just know that some money grubbing evil bastard ISP is going to want to try to use it that way.
Personally I hope the hackers win this one - this kind of blocking of a service the customer is paying for is just evil, especially when it's simply voice chat between friends or family. I've never used Skype and don't intend to but I do fear that if such tools are available, people will want to use them. It's kind of like how the gas stations never charged a dime for air for your tires until somebody came out with a coin-operated air machine, which made some of the station operators figure that they'd charge extra because they could - well in this case the customers are already paying for broadband service, so it's not like they are demanding something to be made available for free. Broadband should not discriminate between applications - how would you like it if your ISP decided to charge you a buck for each e-mail sent and received? |
