| reply to nixen
Re: Storm in a bottle? 66.92.150.14
Xanthia Enterprises
5931 Monticello Rd.
Alexandria, Virginia 22303
United States
Administrative Contact:
Jones, Thomas H ns-admin@xanthia.com
5931 Monticello Rd
Alexandria, Virginia 22303
United States
(703) 560-2687 Fax -- (301) 230-5852
Technical Contact:
Jones, Thomas H ns-admin@xanthia.com
5931 Monticello Rd
Alexandria, Virginia 22303
United States
(703) 560-2687 Fax -- (301) 230-5852
12.108.188.134
Informatica Corporation ewong@INFORMATICA.COM
100 Cardinal Way
Redwood City, CA 94063
US
650-385-5000 fax: 650-385-5500 |
|
 Combat ChuckToo Many CannibalsPremium
join:2001-11-29
Erie, PA | said by RevDNSwhois :
....
Which tells you nothing about where the end users are located. Not to mention that sometimes that info is bogus.
According to your method, I live in NJ.
--
Pi Piru Piru Piru PiPiru Pi! |
|
 TamaraBQuestion The Current ParadigmPremium
join:2000-11-08
Da Bronx
 ·Optimum Online
 ·Clearwire Wireless
| said by Combat Chuck:said by RevDNSwhois :
....
Which tells you nothing about where the end users are located. Not to mention that sometimes that info is bogus. According to your method, I live in NJ. The "new" latency method tells you even less! It triangulates to a major city at best.
The NSA has access to the billing records of the ISPs who assigned those IP addresses. So, it's no big deal for them to get an address and a name. You and I can't just make a phone call, and demand the name and address of the user of that IP at any given time, the NSA CAN. The, resolution, is accurate to the local central office; in a metropolitan city, that's far greater resolution than you will get by the "latency method".
Can you see ANY benefit to using the newly patented Latency method over billing/ISP/DHCP information? If so, please tell me, as I am totally bewildered as to why the NSA is spending money developing an inferior geolocation method from what currently exists.
An IP address always correlates to a billing address (someone on this earth pays for that connection), the NSA has access to this information.
Bob
--
Motor Vessel - Tamara B.
43' Long-Range Trawler
Cape Elizebeth ME.
See her Here. |
|
 calvoiper
join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA
1 edit | said by TamaraB:... Can you see ANY benefit to using the newly patented Latency method over billing/ISP/DHCP information? If so, please tell me, as I am totally bewildered as to why the NSA is spending money developing an inferior geolocation method from what currently exists. ... Bob The only use that comes to mind for me is in making the "rough cut" on determining the location of a VOIP user dialing 9-1-1 from a new location not shared with his VOIP provider--but this would assume that the user could provide "finer" detail on location (street address, hotel name, etc.) but if the user can provide that, they can provide the name of the metro area, too.
Besides, if this needs "many samples", you aren't going to get those in time to help someone through 9-1-1.
calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies! |
|
TamaraBQuestion The Current ParadigmPremium
join:2000-11-08
Da Bronx Reviews:
·Optimum Online
·Clearwire Wireless
| said by calvoiper:The only use that comes to mind for me is in making the "rough cut" on determining the location of a VOIP user dialing 9-1-1 from a new location not shared with his VOIP provider-- Every VOIP packet contains a source and destination IP addresses, which identifies a provider / Country / City / and user account. The "location" will ALWAYS be the last router in the ISP's network connecting to the user.
I still don't get the point of this 
Bob
--
Motor Vessel - Tamara B.
43' Long-Range Trawler
Cape Elizebeth ME.
See her Here. |
|
