The Site > Old Forums > Pacific > "Warning:This topic is too old to reply to."

reply to E_V

Re: "Warning:This topic is too old to reply to."

*Rats* I was praying for a troll not a spammer.

Do you have this thread Site Marked?

Actually no I don't. It's missing the excitation pendant la vie factor that qualifies it as sitemarkly material

So then you un-sitemarked it?

Damn spammers! Now roughly 8% of the posts in here are spam. Or at least were...

reply to Phil
What's really neat about this forum is that we can actually wish a Happy Birthday to a lot of the threads that are still on the front page

I've enabled Topic Tracking for this forum - yesirree - don't want to miss a thing.
--


'Tis the season to be snarky.

If you have it on Topic Tracking, does that mean you need to have it sitemarked? If you don't, you should unsitemark it, if you know how.

I haven't used Topic Tracking before, but am starting to now for this forum. My understanding is that TT is for the whole forum while SM is for individual topics.

Ok, who wants to start a new topic?

This thread has everything. Laughter, music, tears, hearty chuckles and guffaws, spam, and record breaking post replies averaging 2 weeks.
--


'Tis the season to be snarky.

EV, you are bothering those of us who sneak in here for a nap. Go away. :D:D:D

This is the Napping Forum.

reply to Phil
I'm here

*yawn*

reply to Phil
Haha this is fun did it make it to the front page yet?

Let's see - it took 30 days between posts - I'm thinking not

reply to Phil
Aha! So this is where everyone is hiding!

Could you keep it down in here, I'm trying to sleep.