republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

The Way Out

join:2003-01-20

reply to jchin

Re: Seams to me that Level 3 commited a criminal a

said by jchin:

Actually you are wrong!

Cogent was advertising their routes elsewhere. It was the customers of Level3 that got really screwed, cause when their replies to Cogent IPs ended up on Level3's network, the packets were simply dropped (making the connection look dead). At one point, Level3 was proxying the web requests to a website saying that Cogent was the cause (which wasn't the truth). Level3 quickly removed that proxy when enough people called Level3 and complained (I know someone who called and complained).
No, that's just wrong. Cogent does not have full transit. They buy selected transit from Verio for ISPs that they've lost the game of chicken with (think AOL). They didn't buy transit via Verio to Level3, so Level3 never saw their routes.

Level3 did not do anything to filter Cogent's routes from other sources. Cogent simply wasn't advertising their routes via any other transit provider with whom they have an agreement to distribute them to AS3356.

Please provide proof of your "proxy" claim.

Sunday, 27-May 22:17:41 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics