site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

tcope
Premium
join:2003-05-07
Sandy, UT
kudos:1

reply to GreggE

Re: More Tax

said by GreggE:

This guy is not using the roadways, Police Dept, Fire Dept, or Medical emergencies services. He has no representation in that state and cannot vote. What in the hell are they taxing him for if not greed. He doesn't get to use anything in that state, yet he has to pay his share of it. Complete BS
I think you over looked the fact that the company paying his salary benefits from being in NY. The _WHOLE_ premise of the taxation is because the _NY employee_ _CHOOSES_ to live in TN. Again... the NY employee is simply living in TN. Since when did representation or the ability to vote have anything to do with paying taxes? I don't vote. So I don't need to pay taxes?

Here is what is _really_ taking place... income is being paid to an employee in the state of NY. NY has a _right_ to tax that income. In this case it is irrelevant that the person chooses to live outside of NY. That is _his_ choice! Because he _chooses_ not to live in NY does not negate NY's right to tax his income.

We may not like paying taxes on income but it's required.

vic102482
Premium
join:2002-04-30
Upper Marlboro, MD
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

1 edit

said by tcope:

Here is what is _really_ taking place... income is being paid to an employee in the state of NY. NY has a _right_ to tax that income. In this case it is irrelevant that the person chooses to live outside of NY. That is _his_ choice! Because he _chooses_ not to live in NY does not negate NY's right to tax his income.

We may not like paying taxes on income but it's required.
There is no such thing as a [insert state here] employee. That person works for a company and that company is a [insert state here] company. The supreme court already recognizes that money crosses state lines by the sales tax ruling. So money is not being paid to an employee in NY it is being paid to an employee in TN. By your argument, if I order a book from a seller in CA while I am in MD, I am actually giving the money to the seller in MD via wire, and thus sales tax is applicable in Maryland. This is not the case. The money is crossing state lines by virtue of residence, and the same case should be applied here. He is a resident of the state of TN, and he should pay TN income tax. The income is gained in TN the salary is paid out in NY.
--
I tie a rope around my penis and jump from a tree, don't you wanna grow up to be just like me!!!!


GreggE
Thinking - Thinking
Premium
join:2003-06-01
Mid Tenn

said by vic102482:

said by tcope:

Here is what is _really_ taking place... income is being paid to an employee in the state of NY. NY has a _right_ to tax that income. In this case it is irrelevant that the person chooses to live outside of NY. That is _his_ choice! Because he _chooses_ not to live in NY does not negate NY's right to tax his income.

We may not like paying taxes on income but it's required.
There is no such thing as a [insert state here] employee. That person works for a company and that company is a [insert state here] company. The supreme court already recognizes that money crosses state lines by the sales tax ruling. So money is not being paid to an employee in NY it is being paid to an employee in TN. By your argument, if I order a book from a seller in CA while I am in MD, I am actually giving the money to the seller in MD via wire, and thus sales tax is applicable in Maryland. This is not the case. The money is crossing state lines by virtue of residence, and the same case should be applied here. He is a resident of the state of TN, and he should pay TN income tax. The income is gained in TN the salary is paid out in NY.
Exactly...How many big companies have Headquarters in another state than the one you work in. Should we be required to pay tax in that state because they have a physical address there?


JTRockville
Data Ho
Premium,MVM
join:2002-01-28
Rockville, MD
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

reply to tcope

said by tcope:

Because he _chooses_ not to live in NY does not negate NY's right to tax his income.
Do people who commute to NY but live, say, in NJ, pay income tax to NY as well as NJ?


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

1 edit

said by JTRockville:

Do people who commute to NY but live, say, in NJ, pay income tax to NY as well as NJ?
Probably not. I know I am not answering your question, however there is a reciprocal tax agreement between Pennsylvania and New Jersey which allows for people who in one state but live in the other (except for those people living in NJ and working in Philadelphia) to pay their home state's tax. I worked in New Jersey for 2 years and only paid income taxes to Pennsylvania.

I know there is a similar agreement between New York and New Jersey but I am not sure of the specifics.
--
Rove / Rumsfeld 2008!

Sunday, 27-May 19:27:15 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics