republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

vic102482
Premium
join:2002-04-30
Upper Marlboro, MD
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

1 edit

reply to tcope

Re: More Tax

said by tcope:

Here is what is _really_ taking place... income is being paid to an employee in the state of NY. NY has a _right_ to tax that income. In this case it is irrelevant that the person chooses to live outside of NY. That is _his_ choice! Because he _chooses_ not to live in NY does not negate NY's right to tax his income.

We may not like paying taxes on income but it's required.
There is no such thing as a [insert state here] employee. That person works for a company and that company is a [insert state here] company. The supreme court already recognizes that money crosses state lines by the sales tax ruling. So money is not being paid to an employee in NY it is being paid to an employee in TN. By your argument, if I order a book from a seller in CA while I am in MD, I am actually giving the money to the seller in MD via wire, and thus sales tax is applicable in Maryland. This is not the case. The money is crossing state lines by virtue of residence, and the same case should be applied here. He is a resident of the state of TN, and he should pay TN income tax. The income is gained in TN the salary is paid out in NY.
--
I tie a rope around my penis and jump from a tree, don't you wanna grow up to be just like me!!!!


GreggE
Thinking - Thinking
Premium
join:2003-06-01
Mid Tenn

said by vic102482:

said by tcope:

Here is what is _really_ taking place... income is being paid to an employee in the state of NY. NY has a _right_ to tax that income. In this case it is irrelevant that the person chooses to live outside of NY. That is _his_ choice! Because he _chooses_ not to live in NY does not negate NY's right to tax his income.

We may not like paying taxes on income but it's required.
There is no such thing as a [insert state here] employee. That person works for a company and that company is a [insert state here] company. The supreme court already recognizes that money crosses state lines by the sales tax ruling. So money is not being paid to an employee in NY it is being paid to an employee in TN. By your argument, if I order a book from a seller in CA while I am in MD, I am actually giving the money to the seller in MD via wire, and thus sales tax is applicable in Maryland. This is not the case. The money is crossing state lines by virtue of residence, and the same case should be applied here. He is a resident of the state of TN, and he should pay TN income tax. The income is gained in TN the salary is paid out in NY.
Exactly...How many big companies have Headquarters in another state than the one you work in. Should we be required to pay tax in that state because they have a physical address there?

Sunday, 27-May 19:27:51 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics