<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Shady! in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r14775923</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 03:45:36 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 03:45:36 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Shady!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14776220</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/698757"><b>nixen</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  grumpygeek <A HREF="/useremail/u/1124364"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>If a customer is going to run their cable modem at 100%, it's much better economically to have them pounding on your news servers than on your external connections.<br><br>But I can see a lot of ISP's being in an awkward place on this one. It's one thing to have a customer viewing web pages of atrocious stuff. It's quite another to have documented policies of how many days you cache alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.pre-teen and dedicate support resources to it.<br> </DIV>My provider, SpeakEasy, gets around that by simply providing a basic subscription to GigaNews. So, they don't have to dedicate support services or dodge the landmines of explaining retention policies.<br><br>-tom<br><SMALL>--<br>"Some people have morals, standards and ideals about quality, but I'm an American: I couldn't care less." --Tony Pierce (paraphrased)<I></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14776220</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:49:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Shady!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14775923</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1124364"><b>grumpygeek</b></A> : If a customer is going to run their cable modem at 100%, it's much better economically to have them pounding on your news servers than on your external connections.<br><br>But I can see a lot of ISP's being in an awkward place on this one. It's one thing to have a customer viewing web pages of atrocious stuff. It's quite another to have documented policies of how many days you cache alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.pre-teen and dedicate support resources to it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14775923</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:07:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shady!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14773909</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1151381"><b>vincom1</b></A> : It's a cheap excuse to cut something they most likely did not want to continue the expense of operation. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14773909</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:23:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
