 DaMaGeINCThe Lan ManPremium
join:2002-06-08
Greenville, SC
kudos:2 | reply to poppster
Re: 2gb is needed now for fear for high settings As do I. But I have minumim settings that I wont play a game below. And thats the naitive res of my LCD 1280.1024 and at least med settings. If it wont run at that. I dont play it. |
|
| reply to Gib4500
I wouldn't say 2gb is needed. I get great fps with 1.5gb on max settings. |
|
| reply to DaMaGeINC
said by DaMaGeINC:Ran fine at what? 640-480 everything low? Im talking about playen the game how it was ment to be played, thats everything jacked threw the roof. This game was meant to be played at 1024*768. Don't believe me? Read the readme.txt file included with the game. Anything over is pointless on current gen systems. Yeah, you can put 2 grand into your machine to do that, but that's 1.5 grand less than I will spend in less a year to get better results than you have now.
I'm not aiming to start any kind of flame war, but gaming is not a numbers game. It's not about what resolution you run it at or what FPS you get. It's about playing the goddamn game. This game happens to look amazing and run amazing at 1024*768 on my 20 inch 1600*1200 native resolution LCD, and running it higher just gives me some lame bragging rights that no one cares about. |
|
|
|
 Gordo74Premium
join:2003-10-28
Monroeville, PA | reply to Gib4500
Give the guy a break guys, not everyone here has high end systems.
Yes, you can play FEAR on a 9200 at 800x600 res with everythign on medium-low. Sure, all the eye candy isnt going to be there, but that doesnt stop it from being a fun game.
--
Ever wonder about the stars? |
|
 USAOwnzRIP dadkinsPremium
join:2003-11-15
P.R.C. | ...or spooky game. |
|
 MouthPunches fly to the facePremium
join:2004-11-20
Chicago, IL | reply to DaMaGeINC
Looks like you know nothing as iwas playing FEAR fine on 512mb on med setting on 1024x768 |
|
