site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
414
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Gandalf1315
Freelance Philosopher

join:2001-05-23
Indianapolis, IN

Out of control

Greed folks. Pure and simple greed. The corporations in America are out of control at this point and they need reeled in. What we are seeing in America today is not capitalism. It is greed, it is the rich getting richer at the expense of everyone and everything.

The American dream is getting killed. If you come up with a new way to make money the long established corporations are going to do everything in their power to buy legislation to stop you. They don't want to share the pie. They want it all for themselves.

It is not terrorism that we need to fear folks, it is the American corporations because they are the ones that are going to destroy this Country. They are going to bring this Country to its knees and the Great Depression is going to look like a New Years Eve Party when they are through.
--
No man's life, liberty or fortune is safe while our legislature is in session.--- Benjamin Franklin

nonner9

join:2005-10-14
Charlotte, NC

your post references two different concepts:
1. Greed
2. Buying legislation

My response:

1. Greed is fine. Nothing wrong with wanting to make as much money as possible. This is at the heart of capitalism, which is what the USA is about. "...share the pie..." is for communist countries. The American Dream involves working to earn as much as you can for yourself and your family. Sharing is secondary effect of generous people. Forcing sharing results in communism.

2. Buying legislation is something that really needs to be addressed. It is very evident now that corporations can 'buy land' using eminent domain rule. Basically, they can go to a town and say that they want waterfront property for building malls, which will generate more tax and jobs than what that land is already being used for.... that's just an example, but it shows that the abuse exists.

Now that being said, capitalism is by no means perfect, and I think part of the problem you refer to of corporations taking over the world has nothing to do with capitalism. It has to do with capitalism in a democratic/republic society.

Question for you:
How would Bellsouth charging Google money for bandwidth lead to the destruction of the USA. Or more generically, how does corporation using monetary power to persuade elected officials lead to the destruction of the USA?

Maybe the problem is the corporation, maybe it's the elected officials which lack morals and the right mind not be persuaded by the all mighty dollar?


averagedude

join:2002-01-30
San Diego, CA

reply to Gandalf1315
I am all for corps making money, but it does seem they have crossed over to the dark side lately.


bmn
? ? ?
Premium,ExMod 2003-06
join:2001-03-15
hiatus

1 edit

reply to nonner9

said by nonner9:
Now that being said, capitalism is by no means perfect, and I think part of the problem you refer to of corporations taking over the world has nothing to do with capitalism.
Actually, it has everything to do with capitalism and is a valid criticism of capitalism.

said by nonner9:
Or more generically, how does corporation using monetary power to persuade elected officials lead to the destruction of the USA?
Because it bypasses the democratic processes... It leads to an oligarchy where only those with the most money are able to control the government.
--
Support "W"
The one thing worse than idle hands is an idle mind.

nonner9

join:2005-10-14
Charlotte, NC

That first quote was somewhat taken out of context, mainly because I left out the word "alone".

Here's correction:
Now that being said, capitalism is by no means perfect, and I think part of the problem you refer to of corporations taking over the world has nothing to do with capitalism ALONE. It has to do with capitalism in a democratic/republic society.

Capitalism alone is not the problem. When you mix Capitalism with a democracy/republic AND immoral people then you get the oligarchy that you mentionned.
So a corporation might try to influence the law in their favor, the fact that they try is only half the problem, which I think most
people fail to see. If the other half of the problem did not cave in when they saw the all mighty dollar, then that would mean corporations
could try all they want, but it won't do any good.

As much as I don't like corporations using monetary power to sway the law in their favor, we should be more concerned
about the people who these corporations are swaying on their behalf.


bmn
? ? ?
Premium,ExMod 2003-06
join:2001-03-15
hiatus

said by nonner9:

As much as I don't like corporations using monetary power to sway the law in their favor, we should be more concerned about the people who these corporations are swaying on their behalf.
Actually, we should be enqually concerned about them... Especially when we consider the fact that corporations are trying to buy things that typically isn't good for us, but only good for them. For example, look at the current topic. If they can push this through and are allowed to do this, they would have the ability to use their position to unfairly force competing VoIP providers to pay up. That would cause other VoIP companies to raise their prices and eliminate the superior value of other VoIP providers.
--
Support "W"
The one thing worse than idle hands is an idle mind.

nonner9

join:2005-10-14
Charlotte, NC

"...isn't good for us, but only good for them..."
Businesses are in business for themselves, not to help the general population. In a communist country, everyone works for everyone else, which we all know doesn't work.
So, why would you expect a business to make business decision that helps people besides themselves?

The other VoIP companies don't have to raise their rates, in fact, they would be smart to lower them and block all bellsouth customers, so when Bellsouth customers want to get a cheaper VoIP they will find out that it doesn't work on the Bellsouth network. I think your argument assumes that the consumer is dumb and won't take any actions. Is this true, and why?

What's wrong with letting the market run itself? Bellsouth is not trying become a monopoly? You might say that they are using their position as a ISP to eliminate competition from VoIP or search engines. From my point of view, Bellsouth is making a bad business decision. Is this not a valid view?


nonner9

join:2005-10-14
Charlotte, NC

reply to bmn
yes, we should be concerned about both

and what I'm trying to point out is that most people overlook the fact that it's a two-way deal



SRFireside

join:2001-01-19
Houston, TX

reply to nonner9
Businesses are business because we live in a capitalist society that allows individuals to do such a thing. Greed is not capitalism. Greed is one possible result of capitalism. Capitalism is about diversity in the marketplace because just about anybody should be able to get their foot in the door. The problem with the current corporate thinking is they adhere only to greed and not to why they are in business in the first place: to provide a product and/or service.

Bellsouth is looking at greed. Not capitalism. They provide a service, which in this case is Internet connectivity. That is all they should be concerned about. Instead they look at other successful businesses who happen to use their service and think they can squeeze more money out of those businesses for whatever twisted excuse they can think of. The end result is still the same. They ONLY provide the connection and these successful businesses are either already paying for that or their customers are. Trying to take more is rather anti-competitive, and as a result sort of anti-capitalist when you look at it from a certain perspective.


bmn
? ? ?
Premium,ExMod 2003-06
join:2001-03-15
hiatus

reply to nonner9

said by nonner9:

Businesses are in business for themselves, not to help the general population. In a communist country, everyone works for everyone else, which we all know doesn't work.
Actually, a communist country has never existed...

So, why would you expect a business to make business decision that helps people besides themselves?
That's a strawman issue... The issue is whether government should help big business by giving them what they buy via bribes if the hurts the citizens.

Business is suppose to act in its own interest, yes, but the government should not be helping big business at the expense of the average person and small businesses.

What's wrong with letting the market run itself? Bellsouth is not trying become a monopoly? You might say that they are using their position as a ISP to eliminate competition from VoIP or search engines. From my point of view, Bellsouth is making a bad business decision. Is this not a valid view?
Because the market isn't running itself in this case... Bellsouth is using its position to interfere and manipulate the market. Because it controls the network, it can interfere with the competition by interfering with others' services. Bellsouth is in a position to degrade the quality of its competitors and IF it does that, that's Bellsouth abusing its position.

As well, it being a poor business decision does not also mean it isn't also them "using their position as a ISP to eliminate competition from VoIP or search engines." The two aren't mutually exclusive. It can be both at the same time.
--
Support "W"
The one thing worse than idle hands is an idle mind.

Sunday, 27-May 22:51:44 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics