Re: i'm not surprised in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r14948937 en Sun, 06 Dec 2009 05:51:11 EDT Sun, 06 Dec 2009 05:51:11 EDT Re: i'm not surprised http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14949527 dvd536 :
said by ronny_b See Profile :

Back when they were getting into long distance, they sent me a check in the mail for $50. The idea was if I cashed the check, they would automatically switch my long distance to AOL LD. Well, being short on money at the time, I endorsed the check and deposited it in my bank. My long distance never got switched!
Banks do this too only the amount is like $2.50 then by cashing it, you get suckered into a $129/year travel shoppers service
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14949527 Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:59:55 EDT Re: i'm not surprised http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14949370 Grail Knight : I do not like seeing people get ripped off.
--
Fx v1.5 Stipe_ Tb v1.0.7 Aviary]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14949370 Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:08:42 EDT Re: i'm not surprised http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14949210 zcd :
quote:
More states and past and present users need to jump on this bandwagon to force AOL to once and forever go away.
Let em stay with AOL, for if they got on another company, perhaps one you're using, that's less bandwidth for you!
--
-Zach]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14949210 Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:19:37 EDT Re: i'm not surprised http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14948937 major marco :
said by mark470 See Profile :

aol has been doing that crap for years,
it's about time somefolks stand up to aol.
The sad part is that the litigation is a drop in the bucket. Atty fees to AOHell are chump change and these suits won't do shit to dissuade gullible n00bs from using the service. I know plenty of people who can't give up AOHell because of their rural locations and there aren't any other providers. So between illegal charges and the rest of the population rurally located AOHell is set to stay in business for a long long time. :huh:
--
You work hard to put food on your family...shouldn't the pResident speak the words you want to hear? »www.wimp.com/presidential ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14948937 Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:21:10 EDT Re: i'm not surprised http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14948029 ronny_b : Back when they were getting into long distance, they sent me a check in the mail for $50. The idea was if I cashed the check, they would automatically switch my long distance to AOL LD. Well, being short on money at the time, I endorsed the check and deposited it in my bank. My long distance never got switched!

Ron :D]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14948029 Sun, 04 Dec 2005 21:49:16 EDT Re: i'm not surprised http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14945656 Rob A :
said by Geminimind See Profile :

AOhell is evil.
You can say that again.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14945656 Sun, 04 Dec 2005 15:45:07 EDT Re: i'm not surprised http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14945610 Geminimind : AOhell is evil. Haven't used them since 96,and they still tried to keep me on. They charged me without me even knowing. I made them refund me my money. They do not know what the word cancel means.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14945610 Sun, 04 Dec 2005 15:39:49 EDT Re: i'm not surprised http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14944932 MexiCubAZ : Working for a baby bell and seeing the charges billed via several entities to people's phone accounts with out authorization.

I see customers who are billed monthly the moment they are assigned a new number 29.95 for AOL charges that where for the previous customer who had the number. Then AOL gives many of our customers the runaround to remove the charges and stop the billing.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14944932 Sun, 04 Dec 2005 13:48:54 EDT Re: i'm not surprised http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14944566 novaflare :
said by mark470 See Profile :

aol has been doing that crap for years,
it's about time somefolks stand up to aol.
Yep when i had a aol free tril years ago the big thing was slamming aka changing your long distance to aol long distance even after you explicatly said not to. How about charging for the free trial that was popular to. And oh yeh for a couple upgrades to the software that you could nto refuse they charged for that as well. Aol is known for screwing the customers over.
--
DSLR security chat at us.ausirc.net chanel #dslr_sec lets pack this channel open source dns server for *nix and windows »powerdns.com]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14944566 Sun, 04 Dec 2005 12:47:46 EDT Re: i'm not surprised http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14944078 Rob A : Who isn't surprised? Probably no one, from aol, this is expected.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14944078 Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:31:17 EDT Re: i'm not surprised http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14943739 Grail Knight : True, but there is an endless supply of gullible users signing up for AOL to keep them around.

More states and past and present users need to jump on this bandwagon to force AOL to once and forever go away.
--
Fx v1.0.7 Mmoy_ Fx v1.5 Stipe_ Tb v1.0.7 Aviary]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14943739 Sun, 04 Dec 2005 10:35:12 EDT i'm not surprised http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14943701 mark470 : aol has been doing that crap for years,
it's about time somefolks stand up to aol.
--
darn wears that boot loader]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14943701 Sun, 04 Dec 2005 10:27:24 EDT