<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>A la Carte in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r14970054</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:53:38 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:53:38 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: A la Carte</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14971859</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1206900"><b>fiberguy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  b10010011 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1072320"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>It's really a bad analogy because thats not whats happening really.<br><br>The reason cable channels are bundled is because the only way to block analog channels is with a filter in the line for each channel. So in the early days the basic tier was the lower channels, one filter blocked the higher ones, and a separate filter or two for the premium channels.<br><br>As I said before if you only wanted 10 miscellaneous out of 99 analog channels they would have to put 89 filters on your cable.<br><br>The satellite companies has ALWAYS had the technology to do a la carte programming, (conditional access cards at the receiver) fact is back in the C-band days you could get anything you wanted a la carte, <STRONG>but a package was ALWAYS cheaper</STRONG> if you wanted more than three or four channels. I expect the same thing will happen with cable.<br> </DIV>You're statements are true, but not quite. You can very much do ala cart programming in analog cable as well. Not all systems transmitted basic 2 in the clear. In Sacramento, for example, when cable started and for the majority of it's existence, basic 2 and 3 cable was always scrambled. You always required a analog addressable box to receive those channels. <br><br>It's very easy for any cable system today to offer ala cart programming along analog lines. It just requires a box - traps are not an option.<br><br>(A little side note: Sacramento was all scrambled, then trapped and went to the clear, then pulled the traps and rescrambled, then re-trapped and went clear again today. It takes several months each time we did this.<br><br>This will just be the straw the broke the analog cable's back. It may be a good thing in the long run.. but bad in the immediate future. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14971859</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 23:09:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: A la Carte</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14970597</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1072320"><b>b10010011</b></A> : It's really a bad analogy because thats not whats happening really.<br><br>The reason cable channels are bundled is because the only way to block analog channels is with a filter in the line for each channel. So in the early days the basic tier was the lower channels, one filter blocked the higher ones, and a separate filter or two for the premium channels.<br><br>As I said before if you only wanted 10 miscellaneous out of 99 analog channels they would have to put 89 filters on your cable.<br><br>The satellite companies has ALWAYS had the technology to do a la carte programming, (conditional access cards at the receiver) fact is back in the C-band days you could get anything you wanted a la carte, <STRONG>but a package was ALWAYS cheaper</STRONG> if you wanted more than three or four channels. I expect the same thing will happen with cable.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14970597</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 20:21:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: A la Carte</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14970079</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/882322"><b>WangFubar</b></A> : That is a great article, I love the analogy.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14970079</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 19:10:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>A la Carte</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14970054</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/441596"><b>dylking</b></A> : the local paper had a column about a la carte cable choices in today's paper: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/business/personal_finance/13344681.htm" >www.twincities.com/mld/twincitie&middot;&middot;&middot;4681.htm</A><br><br>I personally would take a la carte over bundles or tiers, but then I'm on DirecTV, and I have one of thier bigger bundles - but not the sports package.  If they could/would go a la carte on the satellite, I'd probably jump in and remove some channels (ESP-x, Shopping, SOAP, and so on) that I never ever look at, and have taken out of my 'channels I receive' list.<br><br>I'm glad the FCC is looking at it, but it's not like they can MAKE the cablecos actually do anything...if I understand it right, it's the laws that need to be changed, in addition to the policy...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14970054</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 19:07:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
