<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Defeats the purpopse in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r14973561</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 08:01:51 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 08:01:51 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Defeats the purpopse</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14982483</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/607726"><b>Big Dawg 23</b></A> : If you have a Analog TV with S-Video and cannot tell the difference there is one of two issues your Cables/System is crap or you tv is.  I have Charter Digital and once I hit channel 100 the sound and picture quality is better. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14982483</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 10:50:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Defeats the purpopse</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14973561</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/524578"><b>Toadman</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  WangFubar <A HREF="/useremail/u/882322"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>I don't want to be migrated to digital, I can't even tell if there is a quality difference. </DIV>On a 20" analog tv, you shouldn't be able to tell the difference.  Get a 52" DLP HDTV like I did and you will be able to tell.  The digital 480i is much clearer than analog cable.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14973561</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 08:57:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Defeats the purpopse</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14970493</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1072320"><b>b10010011</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  WangFubar <A HREF="/useremail/u/882322"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><BR><BR>I don't want to be migrated to digital, <br> </DIV>In reality it would take a digital migration to do true a la carte. <br><br>Imagen if you only wanted 10 channels out of 99 on analog cable.  <br><br>They would have to put 89 filters on your tap.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14970493</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 20:07:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Defeats the purpopse</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14970052</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/882322"><b>WangFubar</b></A> : I don't want to be migrated to digital, I can't even tell if there is a quality difference. I had it for 3 months and honestly I prefer the old style analog. I have never been a premium channel sub due to the rediculous cost vs how little I actually watch the channels I have. TV has no "killer app" its all just potato chips for your mind... <br>I am unmotivated to upgrade to any of the speculated a la carte "packages" (doesnt really give the a la carte feel does it?).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14970052</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 19:06:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
