site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
117
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


denyignoredeny

@nycmny.fios.verizon.

Not a good strategy,

recent court precedent says that telcos wishing to provide cable tv channels (content) over any IP infrastructure have to deal with local municipalities in respecting community standards (pornography and decent/indecent material) and to pay franchise fee right of way, NO MATTER THE MEANS by which those signals get to the consumer, and YES that means satellite, potentially too.
Its just a matter of time before it catches up with them!


ronpin
Imagine Reality

join:2002-12-06
Nirvana

1 edit

said by denyignoredeny :

... and to pay franchise fee right of way, NO MATTER THE MEANS by which those signals get to the consumer, and YES that means satellite, potentially too.
...and who actually pays those fees?...you my brilliant friend! (certainly not the providers)
Yeah...stick it to 'em -- and bend-over while yer at it!

lvas

join:2001-05-17
Glen Carbon, IL

reply to denyignoredeny
not true ATT already has permision in Texas to do IPTV state wide.


Sunday, 27-May 21:25:19 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics