| reply to fiberguy
Re: Hmmmm..... This argument coming from a company that has insisted that cable is its primary competition and has bitched incessantly about a level playing field between cable and the bells and the unfair nature of a different regulatory treatment between the two.
Now they come back trying to play with the technicalities of regulatory definition to gain differential treatment, precisely the kind of regulatory BS a level playing field should mitigate.
Then they go back to funding astroturf orgs supporting voip companies paying into usf.
blech. |
